I don't get it
>>215409377d'Vneernasek
i'd rather walk into a volcano than a suburb
>~le walkable cityrino
>>215409377fat toss hates walking, what a cliche
>>215409431nordneer vnorndnaNord vnordna nordn o d'neer
>>215409377broken window first panel
it's funny knowing toss lurks here and that any garbage topic that gets traction he'll make a comic out ofluv ya 'toss!
>>215409377And just why can't we have nice, safe, AND walkeable areas?chudtoss missing the point once again.
>>215409423Kike
Walkable chads are fearless, got it.
The artist is renal failure because of diabetes
>The artist is renal failure because of diabetes
>>215409377cant talk anything he says seriously now that i know hes f*t in real life
never got the whole muh walkable cities thing… you can walk anywhere though you have the high chance kf being mugged by a nigger… or a hobo… or a spic… or uhhhh idk
>>215409377American lefties want walkable urban areas but simultaneously don't want to do anything about the drug addicted homeless and crime plaguing the streets of said urban areas.
>>215409660Suburbanism coincided exactly with the golemization of America
>>215409377Window first panel
>>215409377Lefties love niggers
R8 my stonetoss comic idea >Establishing shot of Martin Luther hammering his theses to the church door>Second panel of the crowd gathering around to take a look>Final panel a close up of the paper nailed to the door, it's just a giant youtube thumbnail printed on the paper of Martin Luther soyfacing in front of the Vatican. The thumbnail is captioned "TOP 95 THINGS YOU DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT CHRISTIANITY!" The amongus is in the hammer.
>>215409377That's pretty ablest my guy.
>>215409377US cities don't have sidewalks/pavements in their suburbs because they're not required to build them. Where there are sidewalks/pavement, they are on private properties.Oh, and by the way: The American auto industry lobbied their government in the 1930s to outlaw walking on streets. So by law you can be fined or jailed if there isn't a sidewalk/pavement and you're walking on the street.
is nobody going to reply to my fucking comic idea? atheist scum
>>215412353Why would the city pay tax money to pave a sidewalk in a remote suburb that doesn’t want there to be one in the first place
>>215412488In free country, people may walk.
>>215412535But who’s going to pay for it?
>>215412575Motor vehicle taxes of course, just like those pay for public roads.
>>215411946I feel like this would work better as a single panel
