No fun allowed: the country
Good thing British legislators are focusing on the important issues
american brain cannot fathom public health
>>215414010>nooooo not the roundabout!
>>215414025lardasses will keeping buying slop and healthy fucks are gonna stay healthyno legislation changes thatit just fucks over the casual consumer for no tangible reason
>>215413986>Americans support anything unhealthyLike clockwork
GOOD
>>215414025>>215414822>>215414830imagine being such goycattle you need the government to physically obstruct you from shovelling food in your disgusting maw
>>215414889i'm a libertarian but this is of low importance
>>215414952I'm a left libertarian and I too think this is of low importance but in the other direction.Let poorfags buy things. Quit trying to fuck my poorfag ass I just want my popcorn and soda to not cost 30 dollars at the theatre
>>215415033>tf >tp
People should be able to buy what they want and also smoke and drink as much as they like but if they are fat then they should be forced onto treadmills at gunpoint. Fuck fatties.
>>215415063Europoors cannot fathom personal responsibility. They're 14 years old until death. This is why they can't have guns or buy junk food. I'd rather have more fat people and not have the state tracking my bowel movements.
>>215414889>>215415033You seem to miss the UK is the only publicly funded health care system in Europe and as such bad consumer habits affect everyone, not just you.Thats's not the right way to go about it bt w I'm just saying that's why they push it so much.
>>215415487I mean I get the idea, we do have talk of similar stuff here and especially with universal healthcare, but when the solution is to punish consumer behavior for acting in their own self interest with essentially state mandated price gouging it's retarded and malignant. If you want to encourage healthy eating dole out better farm subsidies and make healthy alternatives.
>>215414889You do need that though, empirically speaking.
>>215414889Ending a discount isn't obstructing.Obstructing would be putting a tax on fatty/sugary/processed food or banning it altogether.
>>215413986how is this different than buying a bigger, relatively cheaper package? what a retarded ban
>>215413986Those British posters memeing about how cruel it was for companies to price such things so cheaply are now getting their wish
>>215415033>left libertarianfunny way to say pedophilephysically remove thyself from existence you borderless fag
>>215413986>>215414010A friend of mine said: "Both things can be true at the same time: mass immigration is bad and should be reversed and ultraprocessed foods are bad and should be banned." Do you agree with him?
>>215417057I will defend the bacon wrapped tallow fried twinkie if it takes my life through too much cholesterol and diabetes. It is our way
>>215417928Is that friend with you in the room right now?
>>215417928You have no friends
>>215417962No, he said this to me a while back.
>>215417880I hope HIVan kills you in an 'accidental' airstrike
>>215417988Stop projecting. I have many friends. It's nice to have friends. You should try it.
>>215413986ffs, of course it's here
>replying to the botgrim
>>215418000>>215417927fuck I pinged the wrong polack. Eh the message was received
>>215415487>the UK is the only publicly funded health care system in Europethis doesn't seem correct, what am I missing here
>>215418071A lot of Euro social democracies have private pharma and healthcare companies, it's that the health insurance is universal and there's also state hospitals. Look at the Krauts and Bayer
>>215414025>>215414822>>215414830>>215415063>>215415487>>215417057Your anti-Semitic posts are very problematic.
>>215418109>private pharma and healthcare companiesI wouldn't consider private enterprise part of the "health care system," in my view that would only be doctor's and specialist offices and hospitals. Unless the point is that all other medical enterprises in the UK are state owned, which would seem strange. I do know many yuro countries have parallel public and private health systems (the best implementation btw).
>>215418237a Europoor can probably explain it better than I could, I'm more familiar with our own shitty system>(the best implementation btw)I'd debate that for us. Our corporations already abuse our incentives (I mean look at farm subsidies meant to help small farmers being taken up by predator multinationals like the aforementioned Bayer, or funding of private universities). Should just punish them desu and force in price controls and state production of pharmaceuticals as well. They can't be trusted to regulate themselves and if they would they would hike our taxes to make the system unpopular, but maybe I'm a bit too cynical
>>215413986How did I know it's about UK before I even clicked the thread to confirm?
>>215418440By parallel systems I meant hybrid public and private, although thinking about it I guess they necessarly wouldn't be parallel. Public would be the shitty one for poors while private would remain as an option for those already on private insurance and/or don't want to be around the smelly unwashed masses. I don't really care whether pharma companies are nationalized or not desu.
>>215418852no I got what you mean, I'm saying I doubt the companies would play ball, it might even be like the movie Bulworth but more realistically they would overcharge the government to punish voters
>>215414025>public health
>>215413986>cheap slop is funyou are not fascist enough to survive
>>215414010>Lend Gaza your voteI see this all the time, it's a trick so they can get the inbred paki masses to vote for them. What the fuck is the mayor of the west midlands gonna be able to do for Gaza?
>>215421852What's the point, wouldn't all the inbred paki masses vote for them anyway? Trying to also get some guilty white progressives?
>>215413986People will still be fat retards anyway.
>>215415487Makes sense thinking about it this way T. OP
>>215421852it takes votes away from labour so I 100% support it
