>>215450144
The % of the genome related with pigmentation (skin, eyes, hair) is like 0.001% of the total.

Do you really believe that it has impact in intelligence? Not at all.

And ALL ancestors of blond blue eyed individuals descend from brown hair brown eyes individuals. ALL your ancestors 6-8000 years ago (and earlier) were brown haired brown eyed people.


t. blond blue eyed.

>>215450144
In terms of scientific, artistic and pretty much any other achievements a single med nation (any one of them) mogs all nordicks put together ten times over.
Blue eyes are the feature of bimbos and brainlets.
t. grey-blue eyed brainlet

>>215450178
Maybe so but you could simply observe how primitive the brown eyed nations are in europe compared to the germanic countries. Seems like blue eyed people are of a higher caste. Superior souls given a higher purpose by god.

File: World-iq-map-lynn-2002.svg.png (168 KB, 1024x526)

168 KB PNG

>>215450144
Why do you think black negroes in Africa didn't even invent clothes or the wheel themselves?

>>215450251
too busy having sex, apparently

>>215450249
Well, I guess that succesful people 5000 years ago wanted the best and more beautiful genes, so they mixed with those that had the blond-blue eyed mutations and that is why they multiplied.

So, it was succesful and powerful people in the past that got those genes earlier because they were rarer and special.

Anyways, regarding Europe, northern Europe (germanic) were not the top of civilization just 300 years ago.

Regarding anywhere outside Europe: yes, the darker, blacker, more brown --->the worst, especially if they have 20% Homo erectus DNA (black africans).

>>215450144
Baltoids are the lightest and are basically pale negroes, nordcucks have very little culture and art, hence why they are completely americanized. This bait is weak

>>215450144
a swede talking about spirituality, cute
anyway, east asia sends its regards