[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Arya.jpg (62 KB, 736x1233)
62 KB
62 KB JPG
For the longest of time, I always thought "Indo Aryan" simply referred to ancient Indians, and that modern Indians were descendants of Aryans. In our school textbooks it said Indians were Aryans.

But now 4chan is telling me Indians were never Aryans and that the real Aryans were white people.
>>
>>215584348
SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRS
>>
>>215584348
Are you seriously joking? Arya as a word is only mentioned in sanskrit vedas.
>>
>>215584348
no, they were originally Aryan but they mixed with too many [Abo] Dravidians and become poos. There's also a little chink in there
>>
>>215584348
from a haploautism standpoint, yes. autosomally? no lol. too much brown admixture. but tbf, aryans mixed when it was pragmatic wherever they went (BMAC, native northern indians, khosvgol, etc)



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.