[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1728109370846946.jpg (278 KB, 1050x2048)
278 KB
278 KB JPG
who deserves the title of the first Indian colony? Canada or UK?
>>
>>215973774
UK is poolak colony
>>
>>215973827
it takes one to know one, gyppo colony
>>
Colony implies settlement by some sort of willful force. Indians came to these countries because their governments said we need more wage scabs would you like to come here and be a wage scab. Indians said okay sure. Indians attempting to characterize this as some sort of conquest are hilarious.
>>
What do you think colonisation implies? The UK didn't colonise India by sending wageslaves to bolster their economy. Nor does India exert any resource extracting power over the UK or Canada. In fact, the UK and Canada are still extracting resources from India in the form of workers. How in any way does that benefit India?
>>
>>215974647
nigga you literally had a pakijeet PM, and the mayor of your capital is one as well
half of London is owned by pakijeets too



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.