If you are living in a sparsely populated thirdie country like Chile, Russia, Argentina, Kyrgzstan, Kazakhstan, Namibia, Angola or Mongolia it is peak comfy and you don't suffer, but if you are living in a dense, crowded thirdie country like India, Bangladesh, Philippines, Pakistan, Egypt, Lebanon, Nigeria, Turkey, Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Indonesia, Thailand, Iran, Morocco it is pure shithole and you will suffer 24/7.
>>215990511>Brazil>denseWhat in the subhuman macaque roach post is that ?
>>215990536Come on lol. We all know how you live
baffles the mind that someone living like this has the gal to call anyone else subhuman
>nah bro we aren't dense>we have all the space in the world
>>215990511But I live in the most populated area.
>>215990573>>215990599>>215990628only 8% are favela dwellers, if i remember correctly.it's funny, because these favelados laugh, and have more fun and sex than you sad pathetic creature.
>>215990511is zigger land really that third world?
>>215990536Heavy percentage of your population living in the small space along on the coastline. It is a 233 millions country in a small km2. Amazons and mountanious/hilly places makes Brazil hostile for settlement.>>215990687It is still sparsely populated compared to us. Most of Argentina is flat and empty so it is an ideal place for human settlement.
>>215990816Argentina is tenfold denser by that metric
Why do Apezilians always get so emotional and defensive when you say something about their shithole
>>215991132Calm down monkey
>>215991163Yeah, you should do that
>>215991132You wouldn't get it abdul
>>215990816Most Brazilians live in the hilly places "close" to the coast. They are few kilometers away from the coast but topographic separated from it like são paulo
>>215990769they are poor, they can't buy latest phones, laptops, consoles, tvs, gym equipment and cars easily. you need to work for long time like months. these are expensive for average russian. food and clothing prices are normal but you should check your budget everytime. like you can't eat beef and expensive cheese in every 3 day. your meals will be grains, beans, dairy, chicken, pork and some vegetables. western brand shoes and clothes are expensive too.they still have decent infrustracture like water, sanitation, electricity, internet, basic healthcare, schools, roads, airports etc. they are old and broken but still enough for living. you can't drink tapwater but you can use it for showering, washing groceries, brushing your teeth, washing the dishes and clothes etc.>>215990887argentina is flat and don't have trees in everywhere. their cities looks fresh than yours.
>>215990816Not really, compared to our neighbors we don't live confined in a small space, we have a higher population density because we have a lot of people. It only takes in consideration people per total area. Countries where people are truly confined like Canada and Australia aren't shown as dense. That little factoid about all Brazilians living in a small area close to the coast is fake and based on people not realizing how big distances are in Brazil. São Paulo and Belo Horizonte aren't really close to the coast just because they are in the eastern half of Brazil
>>215991679Like, in those maps showing how brazilians live in a strip close to the coast they usually include São Paulo there. Ignoring how just some few kilometers from the coast the Brazilian shield already starts. It's weird to call those cities coastal just because they are few km away from the coast on a map
>>215990511It varies here.
>>215991679Your arguments don't conflict with my views, I said Brazil is dense because of most of population living in the coastline. If Amazons and vegetation are disappeared and people redistributed to all of the country it wouldn't be a dense country.
>>215992004>If Amazons and vegetation are disappeared and people redistributed to all of the country it wouldn't be a dense country.It would. That's what I'm saying. Our total area and total population would stay the same so the calculation of population density wouldn't change
>>215992112If anything, having a high population density index while having a big country indicates that we are using a lot of our territory. If we weren't we would be like Canada
>>215992112If you look at that metric alone Brazil isn't dense, but in reality it is dense because the people aren't distributed all over the country.
>>215990599fucking all of india is densely populated. there is literally nowhere to go
>>215992004>most of population living in the coastlineThis is the type of place you are calling coastline just because it's "close" to the coast on a map
>>215992470Yeah, and?
>>215992507It's retarded. There are hours and hours of mountains between that place and the actual ocean
>>215992606It's still close compared with mate grosso or amazonas
>>215992690Yes but that's meaningless. It's just people using relative distances while looking at our map and going oh this place is "next" to the coastline, not realizing the country has the size of a continent
>>215992874It isn't meaningless if you look at the whole country's map. It's ok.
>>215990511Are you telling me that Netherlands is more densely populated than India? And that half of Europe has the same population density as India?
>>215992987basically yeah, but their cities are planned and rich. so you don't see similar things like indian cityscapes. like macau, singapore and hong kong.
>210million pop>for 8 million km2Brazil isn’t dense at all tho
>>215993590>>215992326>>215990816
>>215992326>>215993777Ok but our crowded parts are still not as dense as the Netherlands or India
>>215994880If I ruled Brazil I would destroy all of the Amazons
>>215990511Population density maps are retarded because they never take into account viability. Size itself does not provide any benefits to the population
