[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Federal states vs unitary states

Discuss
>>
>>215993080
Spain and the UK should become federations
>>
>>215993080
doesn't argentina have provinces instead of states?
>>
>>215993080
it's the level of centralization of gov
>>
>>215993564
They call them provinces, but they're a federation. Same with Canada.
>>
>>215993080
braxil is only federal on paper and you know that
>>
>>215996158
No, I don't know it
>>
Federal States are better. Spain should be a Republic. A shame the republican movement in Spain is asociated with commies, because it would make us improve as a nation.
>>
>>215996158
Same for us honestly
>>
Federal states are retarded. Every state having the ability to make their own choices just divides people and the nation.
>>
>>215997899
He's lying
>>
>>215993080
This country is too young and corrupt to be a federation. Each province is a feudal state where governors stay in power forever gifting like 20 bucks a month to their hungry population
>>
>>215996158
The minimum criterium to be a federal state is that the central government can't dissolve or merge the subnational entities without their political consent. We check this criterium. I think being bare-minimum-federal is the most based way, imagine having different criminal codes because you crossed an arbitrary line inside your own country? Imagine... our society decided that killing babies in the womb is bad but I crossed an imaginary line and got to an arbitrary administrative division created in the 1900s where people have the same culture as me but for circunstancial political reasons killing babies is now le good. It's like totally a different society now with different morals ???????
>>
>>215997917
Our states are just glorified adminstrative divisions, they can't do shit. And that's based.
>>
>>215998053
This.
The only good thing I can think for a federal state is that you can test out a new law in only one state and see whether it works or not.
>>
>>215998201
We can't do that in Brazil. I mean, there are state laws but they are about stuff like creating local holidays, building codes, some special fines in public places. Nothing that could work as a social experiment
>>
>>215998271
False. Incorrect. Wrong. Your sub 83 IQ is showing.

The Public-Private Partnership Law was first encated in one state before becoming federal law
>>
File: Hanging troon.gif (2.53 MB, 480x480)
2.53 MB
2.53 MB GIF
>>215997863
>Spain should be a Republic
Yes.
>Federal States are bett-ACK!!!!
>>
>>215998352
This is probably pre 1988 constitution. Public-private partnership is a constitutional matter. It would be impossible for a state to do it if it wasn't already allowed in the federal constitution. Otherwise it would just be considered a corruption case of some local government trying to sell public assets
>>
>>215998448
Wrong. It was enacted as a state law in Minas Gerais in 2003 (Lei Estadual nº 14.868/2003).
>>
>>215998516
Redundant or just regulatory law then. States wouldn't be able to sell public assets if it wasn't allowed
>>
>>215998587
Wrong again.
>>
>>215998614
>que regulamentou
>regulamentar
FHC was already doing that on federal level
>>
>>215998674
There was no law in Brazil at that time regarding PPPs. This law was the first to treat the matter in the country and it was done at state level. I proved your initial claim wrong. End of story. From now on all you will do is move the goalpost or post fake news/irrelevant stuff.
>>
File: fq6fg3umyki01.png (605 KB, 5000x4926)
605 KB
605 KB PNG
>>215993080
>>
>>215998453
gem
>>
>>215998053
>imagine having different criminal codes because you crossed an arbitrary line inside your own country
You already need to follow a different criminal code if you go to another country, so I genuinely see no problem with following it by going to another State.
Plus State borders, a lot of time, are less arbitrary than country borders.

>>215998516
>>215998587
You two are simply talking past each other.
>>
>>215998749
It was probably the first to regulate it at state level but PPPs already happened in the federal government before that and could only be enforced in state governments if the federal constitution already permitted. That's obvious

>No caso dos portos, não houve propriamente privatização, mas concessões para o setor privado, em particular de terminais portuários. A reforma institucional do setor se iniciou ainda no governo Itamar Franco, com a chamada nova Lei dos Portos. O programa de concessões deslanchou no governo FHC. A modernização resultante beneficiou portos em todas as regiões do país: Rio Grande-RS, Itajaí-SC, Paranaguá-PR, Santos-SP, Suape-PE etc.
This is PPP
>>
>>215998884
The difference is that when I go to a different country they supposedely have a different culture. Here going to a different state is just finding people with a different accent and maybe some circunstancial local political differences that are going to change in 10 years. Nothing truly different morality wise



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.