[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_6941.jpg (153 KB, 1280x720)
153 KB
153 KB JPG
We usually hear about the aryan invasion of India, bringing Vedic tradition and caste on the native indians(Dalit), or the Greek conquest of the indus, the arab conquest of sindh, or the persian/afghan conquests of Delhi, or the mongol dynasty in India with akbar and aurengzeb, or the British raj, but seldom is it talked about when India was taken by a black somalian king from the adal sultanate in east Africa
>>
Zutt got blacked?
>>
>>216012447
None of what you said is remotely true
Just accept your prophet got zutted bro
>>
>>216012535
Blacks were the Zutts anon.
>>
>>216012672
zutts were jeets
>>
>>216012645
Which part are you claiming is not true? And try to disprove it jeet bro, India was blacked
>>
>>216012672
So the blacks zutted the jeets?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.