Is European history or Asian history more interesting? Euro history is so well known but Asian history much less so.
>>216014554weren't they just a bunch of closed off feudal barbarians until white men showed up or whatever?
>>216014586Chinese was inventing writing and agriculture and other things back when Europeans were looking for buries and hunting
Asian history only matters when they buckbroke the wh*te man. Otherwise people have an *urocentric view unfortunately.
>>216014586zhuge liang invented the first hot air balloon and the first tank [armored vehicle on wheels with a combustion blast] over 1800 years ago
>>216014554Depends on what you count as European history and Asian history.If we consider European history from the ancient Greece, interaction with the Middle East and Ancient Egypt. And by Asian history we consider only East Asian history, then European history is probably more interesting overall.
>>216014554>Is European history or Asian history more interesting?>Euro history is so well known Because Europe is the smallest continent in the existence and that is if you consider it a separate continent and not just a peninsula.Everything that happened was interconnected and affected one another so there is more tighter narrative to get invested in.>but Asian history much less so.What is even Asian history?It's the largest continent in existence and most of its history has been self contained. What happened in Turkey was irrelevant to what happened in Japan. What happened in Armenia was irrelevant to what happened in Thailand.This creates a rather disjointed niche where one can simply invest in one thing without bothering with the other.>>216014586The Chinese invented the earliest form of moveable printing in 11th century which is always getting memory holed by globalist academia.
>>216014733>And by Asian history we consider only East Asian historyi like a lot of SEA history like cambodia and thailand, but in general east asian is just more interesting than something like filipino history
>>216014586Yes.
>>216014586which history are you referring to?
>>216014733i consider middle east and northern africa to be to it's own separate thing worthy of being studied on its own, though of course they intersect with other civilizations
>>216014554This is an european world, you're just living in it
>>216015764soon the yuropean world will be a muslim world full of jeets
>>216016020Jeets don't come here. They only go to english speaking countries like your countryIsn't american only 40% white already? You have no place to speak
>>216016558Nigga, there were jeet posters under your flag. They're even in fucking Spain and Poland.
>>216016578Probably a vpn. We don't have that many jeets. You only see them working in food delivery and indian restaurants. We don't let them do other jobs
>>216014554Asian history is oddly unconsequential>build gigantic treasure ships>do nothing with them besides showing off a bit and then retiring them>have the second bloodiest war in history (Taiping Rebellion, 20-30M deaths)>it has no real effect on the rest of the world
>>216016648Is it because China is so big compared to small European countries so whatever happens there still only affects China?
I don't know SHIT about precolonial Indian history.
>>216014554It really depends. But basically the bigger and more powerful a nation historically is, the more interesting its history is. Therefore, I am very interested in Chinese history, but not as interested in, say, Burmese history. You really cannot say one region of the world has more interesting history though, I would just say every has different interests.
Asian history is vague, you probably mean slanted eyes history, which can be summed up by A U T I S M and trillions dying
>>216014554total bullshit
>>216015248Not interested im the history of your own former colony (The only American colony in Asia in fact).Typical Americunt.
Is middle eastern history considered asian history?
>>216019690Middle east is just middle east imo
>>216019690they are their own department
>>216014554I have absolutely zero interest in Asian people or their history outside of European and American interactions.
