Why is Iraq not a GCC country yet?
>>216023972because it's an iranian proxy
You are asking the wrong questions. Why are the GGC countries not replaced with one unified state? Given the geostrategic and political-economic reality of the Arabian Peninsula.
>>216023972they're sumerians not arabs
We are not ZUTTED
>>216023972Not arabs.
>>216024419What does that even mean and why do I keep seeing this word on every board
>>216024594People who post BBC and this are the same
>>216024689That only answers half my question, who or what is zutt?
>>216024795Indian
>>216024795Jattsthey are mostly pakis
>>216024874>>216024918How does India/Jatts relate to Iraq or the arabian peninsular? I feel like there is a lot of context I am missing here. Guess I'll skim the wikipedia article for Jatts, anyway thanks for the answers.
>>216025081Saudi has a lot of Indians, they are therefore as one might say ZUTTED. Iraq does not.
>>216025081Goes pretty deep. Saddam Hussain even suspected of being a jeet.
>>216023972They almost became one but shit happened
>>216024287Competing geopolitical interests
>>216024455Look who's talking
>>216025081prophet muhammad (pajeets bust upon him) got zutted
>>216025371Which competing geopolitical interest? The Arabian Peninsula should be considerd to have a common geostrategic considerations? Given the fact that a State in that region need to secure the Red sea with the Bab mandeb chokepoint and the Persian gulf with the Strait of Hormuz chokepoint? King Abdelaziz Al Saud tried to conquer the trucial states. The British prevented it. Should we not distinguish the particular interests of the individual government-patronage systems from objective geostrategic confinements? Please elaborate anon?
