>>216040269
if you like her fuck her whats the problem

>>216040269
>Should I care about my future partner's intelligence?
intelligence is a heritable trait, so yes

>>216040269
retarded sons could be trouble but retarded daughters are actually easymode.

>>216040269
I know that this is just dumb shitposting, but as someone with a wife and kids, here is my take:

>sex partner
I mean, if you’re into sleeping with dumb girls, you might as well go for it. When I was single, I wasn’t that into meaningless/casual sex, so even if I wasn’t hoping for a serious relationship, I wasn’t likely to fuck someone I didn’t enjoy hanging out with, which mostly precluded stupids.

>life partner
I can’t fathom how anyone could endure a serious partnership with someone that they found dumb, unless they were themselves a lot dumber than they thought they were. A trophy wife/kept woman kind of situation, where the only relevant feature is sexual attraction sounds hellish to me. Likewise any setup where all someone wants is a brood mare and/or housekeeper. I wouldn’t be satisfied by a life like that.

All women are mentally children

>>216040320
>intelligence is a heritable trait, so yes
Its too much of a gamble either way to prioritize over love honestly.

>>216040269
As long as it isn't horoscope or star sign shit.

>>216041738
Children are the biggest gamble. Imagine thinking you’re going to have a healthy child, only to end up with a forever incontinent low functioning autist. Plus it’s not like autism can be detected in utero