[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: image.jpg (117 KB, 1280x720)
117 KB
117 KB JPG
Between 1864 and 1873, a 28 km2 piece of land within the USA was forgotten by surveyors when they divided the land to form new states. Located at the meeting point between Montana, Idaho and Wyoming, "Lost Dakota" still belonged to the former Dakota Territory, 580 km away from where it sits.
It had no known inhabitants, but was infested by bears. It is now part of Montana's Gallatin county, in the Yellowstone national park.
Found out about it after watching the show Yellowstone, in which ranchers throw away dead bodies "in a piece of land forgotten by the authorities at the border with Wyoming", I thought it would only be a made up story. Apparently in reality, no sign of illegal activity was ever found there, although technically outlaws could go and hide from authorities which had no jurisdiction in this piece of land.

Imagine having so much land that you end up forgetting about its existence.
I find this anecdote fascinating. Do you have any similar examples somewhere else?
>>
File: image.png (126 KB, 706x480)
126 KB
126 KB PNG
Also found a random youtube video and blog post that talk about it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyhCzIOX82g
https://mtbeyond.com/history/lost-dakota/



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.