According to you in your country, who would win on neutral scenarios in your opinion in your country?
>>216147085Caesar simply by virtue of having better technology. The Battle of Cynoscephalae (197 BCE) demonstrated Roman Legions had no issue defeating the Macedonian phalanx.
>>216147266yes that's why i said in a neutral scenario where they have even tech.
>>216147085Ahem.
>>216147085Alexander wins if it's open warfare. Caeser wins if it's a drawn out campaign. He could have probably won the siege of Tyre for example but would have lost Gaugamela against Alexander.Caeser also looked up to Alexander lamenting that by his teens Alexander had conquered the known world while he'd accomplished nothing in comparison.>>216147266Alexander had his companion cavalry though and they ran purely on loyalty and trust in Alexander. The Legionnaire would get routed because they're way too slow.
>>216147085>>216147364Remember the internet 5 years ago when chuds were all obsessed with this?
caesar lamented at his same age alexander accomplished more than him
>>216148330I don't.NapoopaN TotallatoT always wins.
