Will tigers ever become ubiquitous again? My friend who lives in a small village in maharastra said tigers used to frequently eat livestock historically because they were the apex predator, but there have no tiger sightings in the past 20 years.
>>216204109I don't even know what ubiquitous means.
>>216204109Did you know that Russia has tigers?
>>216204160No
>>216204178Now you know.
>>216204190Thanks :3
>>216204109Go to zoo, then you can watch tiger.
>>216204109something tells me it has to do with the fact that if you open google maps, center on india, turn on street view, and click on a random place in the country, 99% of the time you will see trash strewn about
are tigers the answer to the jeet question?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_attacks_in_the_Sundarbans
Literally the only interesting post in this site
>>216204160Russia is not europe so europsissys cant claim tigers
>>216204841Russia is the biggest country in Europe, alshyally.
>>216204109Tigers were based because they used to eat Indian people, they were a check for overpopulation. How have you bulldozed all of the tigers territory but, still not urbanized to a high level?
>>216204109Wildlife worldwide is unfortunately dying out. The majority of animals are lifestock.
>>216204882Then kazhakistan and turkey should be europe too
>>216204947Yes, parts of Turkey and Kazakhstan are in Europe. Any more questions?
>>216204882you are correct but said tigers live on the other side of russia, i.e. asia
>>216204963They are not considered Europe tho
basterds benchods
>>216205100They are transcontinental countries just like Russia. But unlike Russia, the absolute majority of their population lives in the Asian part. 80% of Russians live in the European part.