[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: wait.jpg (130 KB, 782x465)
130 KB
130 KB JPG
sup /int/
Internationally speaking, what DNA company would you recommend for someone from an underrepresented population?
>>
File: 1737065478667859.gif (1.82 MB, 329x250)
1.82 MB
1.82 MB GIF
>>216237595
>You are.... loading... loading... loading... 100% brown
>>
>>216237595
Ancestry is probably the second best. If you've already done a test you can upload you're raw data to Illustrative DNA and get some cool results
>>
File: My DNA.jpg (916 KB, 1791x801)
916 KB
916 KB JPG
>>216237595
some people have praised FamilyTreeDNA, but i havent used their services
i use genotek, but this service is only for rusnya
>>
>>216237595
Exactly 0 because giving your money to a company for them to harvest your DNA is beyond imbecilic, though I understand the appeal for insecure mutts.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.