Why isn’t India a superpower yet? They are capitalist and democratic and have all the talented ceos
If they're not a superpower how come they live rent free in your head all day long?
Not a single CEO of Indian heritage is an Indian national. The jeet mind works in mysterious ways because it still hasn't figured this out.
>>216287344you know exactly why but, a (You) farmer's gotta tend to his crops huh?
India is a superpower. They have nuclear weapons, they own all the Fortune 500 companies, they have cornered the market on superconductors and quantum relays, and they now have the highest IQ in the world.
>>216287344Because their flag has a butthole on it
>>216287344>capitalistno>Democraticdemocracy destroys countriesAlso, their population is genetically inferior. The only way to turn monkeys into first world countries is showering them with gold. Look at Arabs and Norwegians.
>>216287377
>>216287496>democracy destroys countriesTrue, but what's the alternative? Fascism? Everyone saw how that turned out, especially (You).
>>216287377all 500? really?
>>216287647Fascism is actually democratic in their own definition.the idea is what would preserve a minarchy the longest, and some think a constitutional monarchy without the monarch sharing powers would do that. this may be improved by splitting countries into countless city states, fragmenting the power of the monarch thus forcing them to either keep good practices, or see their constituents flee.
Bait, but I do think British India should have been partitioned into more countries after independence, because India itself seems to spend too much effort keep itself together. Instead of spending excess productivity to reinvest into more productivity and make civilisational improvements, India spends excess productivity to suppress breakaway ethnicities through bribery of individuals and bribery of entire groups (which is why half of it's industries are subsidized but unproductive)I know about muslims immediately trying to conquer everyone and smaller states would be more vulnerable etc, but I'm saying ideally Britain would have overseen partition more, "Indians" would have been less classist/castist and retarded and therefore less expansionism.
>>216287496>Also, their population is genetically inferior.THIS. The only cure for inferior genetics is suicide or elimination. That's why jeets have existed for like 2 billion hyears but have no achievements apart from nepo-baby poop scamming their way into western CEO positions.
>>216287344>>216287355india is the great filter, one day we are going to get into space and find alien archeological remains and on every planet that couldn't get into space we are going to find evidence of hinduism planet wide
>>216287995If we supplanted countries with city states, they'd just find a way to consolidate again eventually, just like what happens during power vacuums.
>>216287948why don't the colors match the numbers? russia and india have different colors and the same number. Same for canada and the US
>>216287344India needs communism to truly succeed. Large diverse countries can't into capitalism. Just look at the state of the US.
>>216287344How's your space program going, Hao?
Third world countries are only "capitalist" for large corporations, something like 90% of india's economy is informal because the government invents absurd bureocratic requeriments to extract bribes and fines from the people, the same happens in every poor country
its a (made up)nation of brown liars, cheats and thieves
>>216289918even if they eventually did centralize power, that doesn't mean we shouldn't strive for that anyways. Just because you get dirty, doesn't mean you shouldn't take showers.
>>216289945this but unironically
