[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1744487160821522.jpg (175 KB, 800x582)
175 KB
175 KB JPG
why does he make them seethe so much?
>>
Who? He makes a lot of people seethe.
>>
File: IMG_1035.jpg (189 KB, 1206x1341)
189 KB
189 KB JPG
>>
China’s rise triggers strong reactions in the U.S. because it challenges long-standing assumptions about America’s global position and values. Economically, many Americans associate job losses and deindustrialization with China’s manufacturing success, creating personal resentment. Strategically, China’s growing military and technological capacity is viewed as a direct threat to U.S. dominance, fueling anxiety about losing superpower status. Ideologically, China’s ability to achieve major economic progress without adopting a Western democratic model contradicts the belief that freedom and prosperity must go together. Politically and culturally, media narratives emphasize conflict, human rights controversies, espionage, and competition, shaping public opinion toward fear and hostility. Beyond specific issues, the deeper concern is that China represents an alternative vision for the global future—one where the United States is not automatically the primary rule-setter.

In short: China’s success pressures U.S. identity, security confidence, economic stability, and ideological self-image. The anger is less about China itself and more about what China’s trajectory implies for America’s future.

If you want a follow-up, I can provide either:

A) A balanced view of American concerns that are justified vs. exaggerated
B) A look at how ordinary Chinese citizens view American reactions
C) A historical comparison with U.S.–Japan tensions in the 1980s

Which direction would you like to explore?
>>
>>216290214
he doesn't look like that
>>
>>216290297
Nothing says fascism like state enforced minority rights and workers' cooperatives.
>>
File: 1761584135622071.jpg (231 KB, 1023x1023)
231 KB
231 KB JPG
>>216290214
They recently took down two US aircraft within 30 minutes of each other and Trump had no choice but to let it slide and blame it on "bad fuel," whatever that means.
>>
Because all this technology makes the stakes extremely high
>>
>>216290337
if that's true why haven't they taken taiwan tho
>>
>>216290366
Remember in 2019 the goalpost was Hong Kong.
>>
>>216290380
>china hasn't done anything noteworthy in 6 years
>the last thing they did was take territory that was already theirs
you gonna brag about taking over tibet next?
>>
Because he own our countries
>>
>>216290398
My point is that slow and steady wins the race. Or do you not remember the seethe and impotent rage from the trump administration when the PRC crushed the "revolution of our times". Nobody contests that the PRC runs Hong Kong from top to bottom anymore after decades of cia agents running around like retards there.
>>
>>216290398
the media were silent about it
>>
>>216290443
>slow and steady wins the race
okay how long until china takes taiwan then? can you give me an estimate?
>>
>>216290485
>can you give me an estimate?
Yes.
>>
>>216290297
Nobody knows anything about China and just uses it as an excuse to talk about themselves pt.99999



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.