UK is a socialist country now.
>bottom 90% of people are poor>"solution" is to make the top 10% poor as well many, many such cases
>>216468907What happens when you import zutted mudslimes and nignogs past a critical mass
>>216468962As NYC is about to find out
>>216468962They're not making them poor per se, they're just chasing them out of the country
>>216468962wealth redistribution in the form of land reforms works, if rich people are hogging up productive land, redistributing some of that land to the poor will overall improve the economy.
>>216468907How does that work out by the way? Lines are straight, doesn't seem fair for the bottom 95%. Doesn't sound very socialist to me.
>>216469950They are at rank 1 and rank 2. Their income are too above other countries' people income.
>>216469709Yes nigel bro, britain is currently a feudal, agriculture based economy, so land redistribution is the way to solve our current economic woes. Thanks for reminding us of this.
>>216468962I still don't get how socialism is anything but political spitefulness
>>216468907>middle ranked lowit's... it's because they ARE low earners...
>>216469950each line is a country
>>216469709>if only the serfs had more land to farm all our problems would be solved... damn these nobles hoarding all the land for "commerce" and "industry"
>>216470480in the UK agricultural land is owned by a few lords
>>216470348Depends what you mean by "socialism" and also how you place yourself in society To me, a lower-middle-class wigger, socialism proper is solidarity and cooperation, not spitefulness.>>216469995>>216470475I did struggle to understand the graph but I see it now, thank you.
>>216470480I wanted to mention how the UK is a poor example of executing socialism because the foundation of their country is literally aristocracy and corporatism tied closely together. They'd have to completely tear that shit down if they wanted to truly implement a socialist doctrine.
