why are ameripoops like this?
Reap the whirlwind krauts
>>216566197The pilot who released one of the nukes said something along the lines of>I'd do it againin his memoirs.
lead poisoning
>>216566252https://youtu.be/H36v-d6_NS0Paul Tibbets is HIM
>>216566197There will be no repurcussions because America is the Oyabun of the world
>>216566197America benefited much more from a sunken uboat than for 100 brits. he is a hero.
>>216567778>I'll kill civvies but it's gonna save lives o algonazi logic kek
>>216566252If I were transported back in time in his place I'd do it too And I don't hate the Japanese
>>216566252this isnt the samenuking the japanese was a tactical decision, this is attacking a boat that was rescuing survivors from a sunken ship
>>216568079Europeans still don't realize that whenever we have an actual serious war going we adapt our military tactics and morals to imitate and kill the threat then just revert to previous save once our survival is assured? It's so obvious.
>>216568147>murdering civvies in Polandgenocide, crime against humanity>murdering civvies in Japanhard, but necessary decision to save lives in the name of freedom and liberty, dog bless
>>216566252To be fair Japan did deserve more nukes for starting a war in this region.Even if the Americans generally didn't care for the locals and Asian people the Japs still murdered hundreds of thousands of Americans across multiple island campaigns.
>>216568189I don't mind that in the slightest. It's the double-faced description of it all that just reeks of hypocrisy. Killing innocent civilians is just that. No need to pepper it with pointless ideological statements about liberty or the Aryan race or gommunism.
basedtotal angloid death
>>216566252it may have glitched out his brain because the guilt could've killed him
I don't see the use of nuclear weapons as any different from the use of conventional weapons. You're just using one bomb instead of thousands for largely the same result If it was a crime to use them then you have to say that any and all forms of bombardment is also a crime
>>216569160Yes, the firebombing of Tokyo was an equally heinous crime. Happy?
>>216569189If you take that angle then war itself should be considered a crime and the combatants should use any means necessary to destroy their enemies fighting capacity as quickly as possible
>>216568211youre retarded if you think that shooting people at point blank range is the same as dropping a bomb on a city producing weapons and making warships
>>216569189Why didn't they surrender before that? They had no navy by that point and no anti-air to counter the bombers. Stalin was planning on invading as soon as 1943. Did they want a future where we're talking about north and south Japan and we're calling Hokkaido Sakhalin oblast?
>>216569289That's why stuff like the Geneva convention was agreed upon. At some point people realized that "Wollt ihr totalen Krieg?" retardation leads to nothing but destruction and suffering on both sides.
>>216569331>I did it from a distance bro it doesn't countwut>>216569354>Did they want a future where we're talking about north and south Japan and we're calling Hokkaido Sakhalin oblast?They wanted a future where Japan is a hegemon o algo. Your post is you explaining why you nuked the japs in the first place lol. You were afraid the Soviets would land at the same time as you would and you'd not get the whole pie to yourself. So irradiating civilians it is.
was the nuke really that necessary?were they really gonna fight to the last man?
>>216569418>>I did it from a distance bro it doesn't countthats your words not minejapan refused to surrender and announced they would form civilian militias to fightgermans murdered tens of thousands of poles by individually shooting them after poland surrenderedi only wish germany was better at fighting so hamburg and dresden could be nuked instead of firebombed
>>216569484No, it’s literally your words. Whether you kill a civilian with a knife or a sniper rifle doesn’t matter, so I don’t see what your whole point is. Admittedly shooting someone point blank is relatively more humane than having them die of radiation poisoning.
>>216569418There's definitely stupid things the US did, like supporting the Soviets at all when they knew how overwhelmingly dominant they were in resources. Once Japan attacked China the US immediately soured on them, probably because of the Monroe Doctrine, Japan attacking the KMT caused pretty much every neutral stance on geopolitics to go out the window. They created that shitty position, but Japan not surrendering almost guaranteed a Soviet invasion in due time.
>>216569546>No, it’s literally your wordskek its notpoint out the post where i LITERALLY said that >>216569546>Whether you kill a civilian with a knife or a sniper rifle doesn’t matterwhy, because you say so? the aim was to reduce japans fighting capability by destroying their factories and ports, but theyre always surrounded by peoplegermany wanted to genocide poeple to make room for living space, americans wanted to prevent thousands more of their soldiers dying in a war that japan startedgod youre scum
>war doesn't end soon enough and Soviets grab some of Japan>end up with an Imperial Japan-North Korea hybrid that is actually scary
>>216569607>like supporting the Soviets at all when they knew how overwhelmingly dominant they were in resourcesThat's a complicated take. Hitler admitted to not having any capacity to invade the US at any point. So the USSR losing to Germany would not have done anything to you realistically speaking. But then it would have been just a different flavor of Cold War with Germany arguably stronger than the USSR. Both the Soviet and the German GDP shrunk by 30-40% due to the war.>>216569638>point out the post where i LITERALLY said that>>youre retarded if you think that shooting people at point blank range is the same as dropping a bomb on a city producing weapons and making warships
>>216569746>>>youre retarded if you think that shooting people at point blank range is the same as dropping a bomb on a city producing weapons and making warships>>I did it from a distance bro it doesn't countah yes, identical sentences
>>216569331>youre retarded if you think that shooting people at point blank range is the same as dropping a bomb on a city producing weapons and making warshipsyeah. dropping bombs on innocents is far more cowardly and destructive. war is for faggots.
>>216568147>nuking the japanese was a tactical decisionnot really. the firebombings were more significant than the nukes
>>216566197since when does the red cross have uboats?id bomb it too
>>216566197Americans won because they had that mindset, imagine not absolutely obliterating your enemies and instead trying to play gentlemanly like that, Hitler was such a softie and probably lost the war by trying to appeal to reason so much and to that idea of aryan brotherhood with the British, such romanticism always ends up in disaster, in war you have to be a realist, the British Isles should have been obliterated and their civilians massacred relentlessly and purposefuly on air raids, all the civilian infrastructure destroyed to the point of societal collapse, the Dunkirk soldier slaughtered to the last one, if you are going to war you have to be willing to invoke those demonic energies and become an actual murderer. And all of that to end up becoming the epitome of evil anyway.
>>216571039>That flag>That postOf course you would. You doubletap bomb hospitals to maximise the number of dead doctors and nurses.
>>216569638>>216569787Just admit you only value polish lives, you bloodthirsty savage.
>>216571331And that's why they are winning and the Palestinians are reduced to a show of pity and clemency, crying for injustice, crying to the world for help.
>>216571324>Hitler was such a softie and probably lost the war by trying to appeal to reason so much and to that idea of aryan brotherhood with the British, such romanticism always ends up in disaster, that is characteristic to nazi ideology. i think people would've gotten disillusioned sooner if he resorted to that.by contrast, it's known that america is a country of duplicitous morals and ethics so they would have fewer issues with committing war crimes
>>216571520The Palestinians (Hamas) won.They still exist, Gaza still exists, half the world sees them as the victim, not the cause.
>>216571331i dont, im saying if i was in a war i wouldnt fall for low tier tricks like putting different flags on the enemy's stuff
>>216571721Are you retard, dumb or just pretending to have half a brain cell?
>>216571852i just have basic reading comprehension which you probably dont but you can still achieve this, just re-read >>216571039 until you get it
>>216566197>ameripoopsDO NOT INSULT YOUR ANGLO-SUCKSON MASTEROnly I can do this.
>>216572552When I shit a rusnigger eats it
>>216566197American bombers would bomb Croatian islands just to lose the extra weight so they have enough fuel to return home. My grandpa's village was wrecked and all the ships in it even though no Italians or Ustashe were ever present there. Late war USA was loaded with ammo and would shell and bomb everything and anything just in case.
>>216568260>No need to pepper it with pointless ideological statements about liberty or the Aryan race or gommunism.The pretense of legitimacy is very important thougheverbeit
>>216566252He also did at least one video interview where he says the same. >>216567778lol beat me to it You'd be surprised how many people wouldn't lose a nights sleep over killing 200k civilians or whatever the exact number is.
