1.The scientific principles of picking up girlsFirst Axiom: The Axiom of SensationAxiom 1: In a state of freedom, the vast majority of women's decisions are based on feelings, which are based on instincts. Instincts, in turn, are based on Nash equilibrium strategies evolved over millions of years in primitive societies, representing the optimal (locally stable) strategy. Modern evolutionary theory tells us that, under evolutionary selection, all behaviors of animals, including humans, must serve survival and reproduction. However, this clearly cannot explain many problems. For example, why are there so many single women in major coastal cities in China and the United States who would rather remain childless than marry? This brings us back to a readily observable fact: the vast majority of women's decisions are based on their own feelings.So how do we connect these two seemingly contradictory theories? It's actually quite simple: women's feelings are essentially the instincts that have evolved over millions of years that are most beneficial to women's survival and reproduction. The technological development of patriarchal civilizations in the last 5000 years has been incredibly rapid, while human instincts have not yet evolved to adapt to modern high-tech society. After losing the constraints of traditional virtues like the Three Obediences and Four Virtues, women, guided by their feelings, once again followed the optimal strategies of primitive society in their lives.If modern economics is based on game theory analysis of the "rational economic man," then we can call modern women "feeling people."We can directly assume that everything they do is to make them feel better. And by taking satisfying their feelings (i.e., the optimal strategy of primitive society) as "utility," we can begin to use game theory to study the behavior of feeling people (women).
Second Axiom: The Axiom of PolygamyAxiom 2: Polygamy is a normal occurrence in human history; women's attraction to strength and upward mate selection are Nash equilibrium strategies.First, combining Axiom 1, the following theorem can be easily derived:Theorem 1: Women's attraction to strength and upward mate selection is innate.Here, saying that polygamy is the "normal" does not mean that all men have multiple spouses.According to Fisher's principle, the human sex ratio is close to 1:1, making it mathematically impossible for every man to have multiple spouses.This "normal" also does not mean that every woman has to be a concubine. In fact, after reviewing various materials, whether ancient Chinese historical records or the social conditions of modern Muslim countries and sub-Saharan Africa, even if polygamy were completely legal, only about 30% of men would have two or more spouses.However, as long as polygamous families exist as a normal occurrence in society, and as long as entering into a polygamous relationship is one of a woman's choices, this will profoundly change women's feelings and mate selection strategies.Let's conduct a thought experiment. Imagine if humans had a switch that caused them to die immediately upon having sexual relations with a second person of the opposite sex. Or, to be more lenient, humans could only produce offspring with their first sexual partner. After millions of years of evolution, both men and women would tend to find a partner of similar caliber (percentage of their own) and settle down to reproduce. However, this is clearly not realistic.
Since polygamy has been the norm for over a million years, with women primarily responsible for raising offspring, the optimal mate selection strategy for men would naturally be to seek multiple partners, even if those partners are less desirable than themselves, to increase the number of offspring. Women, on the other hand, have a limited number of offspring to reproduce in their lifetime and must dedicate more effort to raising them. Therefore, the optimal mate selection strategy for women is to reserve their limited reproductive resources for more desirable men, maximizing the number of offspring they share with such men.This explains why, since monogamy is the norm, over millions of years of evolution, the instincts of both men and women align with the Nash equilibrium strategy of polygamy: men will not refuse young, beautiful, and loyal women. However, forcing a woman to mate with a man less desirable than herself and even procreate would be extremely painful for her. She would feel she has lost in this polygamous mate selection game, that her genes have been contaminated, and that she cannot produce superior offspring.Combining Axiom 1 and Axiom 2, the following conclusion can be drawn:Inference 1: Women's attraction to strength is morally equivalent to men having multiple partners.
Third Axiom: Women Have No LoveAxiom 3: Women only love their children; their feelings towards men are merely an infatuation for obtaining genes and a demand for support and protection.Here, "love" is defined as unconditional affection. If we define "romantic love" as unconditional affection between men and women, then the following inference easily follows:Inference 2: Women have no romantic love.According to Axiom 1, a woman's nature and feelings actually serve the survival and reproduction of primitive societies. Therefore, it's easy to understand that women only have unconditional affection for their children.A woman's feelings towards men actually serve two major needs she has of men. The first need is to provide superior genes. Therefore, when a woman sees a man she instinctively perceives as having excellent genes, she falls into a frenzied infatuation, wanting to immediately mate and reproduce with him.However, this infatuation is not romantic love. A woman may only want to sleep with you, not necessarily develop a long-term relationship, and is unlikely to give you real money.
Let me explain the terminology for readers with lower IQs."Rational economic man," also translated as "rational person" or "economic man," refers to the assumption in economic research that all people are selfish and unemotionally driven, pursuing the maximization of their own economic interests. While money is not the only motivation for human behavior in reality, this simple assumption simplifies mathematical models, making game theory analysis feasible and straightforward."Utility" refers to a value that each participant (player) in game theory tries to maximize. Under the rational economic man assumption, utility is equivalent to money. Under the feeling man assumption, utility is equivalent to feeling, which is the degree of approximation to the optimal male-female game strategy in primitive societies.It refers to a man having multiple female partners, including monogamy with concubines.It refers to the theory of natural selection, suggesting that in species with relatively small differences in sex, including humans, the sex ratio will be close to 1:1.Otherwise, the smaller sex has an evolutionary advantage, thus restoring balance.
>>216588216Recently found out that good looking Chinese girls actually DO like brown skin men. You just have to have a really, really, pretty face like mine and good natural bone structure.
>>216588645lel,This Incel thinks he understands Chinese women better than I do.Me = Has slept with 100+ women, owns his own company, AI programmer.
Never stop posting, Godspeed chang
>>216588746Im always happy to learn more, senpai.
based schizo chang keeping /int/ alive
didn't read but okayam not really planning on dating chinese women and i doubt chinese women are planning to date people like me too, which is good
>>216588746>Me = Has slept with 100+ womenhow many did it without monetary compensation?
>>216589478all
>>216588645>>216588746>>216589478>>216589855the way you guys talk makes me NOT want to fuck women anymore, thanks a lot. if the only good thing that comes out of fucking women is being able to brag about it to other men on the internet then i will not be wasting my time on that.
>>216589893You clearly didn't finish reading my thread.I never take pride in fucking pussy.
>>216588216>>216588269>>216588297>>216588340>>216588368This is all very basic/normal shit and aligns well with any dating advice given to men and also mine and many others personal experiences.
>>216589942i feel like you're trying to compensate for the time you've lost by trying to make wacky hypotheses about it in order to feel like you've actually done something and want to share it to other people
don't care, I will still get a Chinese wife
>>216588216Uhm can you put this into like a... Comprehensive video format, preferably edited and posted to YouTube so I can watch it and not read thisThanks a lot xoxo
The woman in the picture is a professor at the Shanghai Conservatory of Music. Her husband is a 60-year-old real estate developer who looks like a pig. I have her phone number. I actually think just anyone could sleep with her. So I call her "hooker."BTW
Don't care. Didn't read. Married and bred a Chinese woman from a rich family. Poached her while she was here to study.
