When can we have this? Include the US states that are considered Azaltan too though
>>217004142Never, you favela monkey.
>>217004142Only if they speak Spanish. Portuguese is too musical to be a serious imperial language.
>>217004142>latinX dreams of empire>but they were empire once>they broke up because they hated each so muchwhat's wrong with brown people?
>>217004335true. it really is favela-swedish
>Azaltan
>>217004142I'm not too familiar with the Empire of Brazil or Brazilian history. What are/were Brazil's irredentist claims? How big could Brazil have (realistically) gotten? Uruguay? Northeast Argentina? More of Paraguay during the war? Any of the Guyanas?
This site has really hit rock bottom. Half of the posts here are indians false flagging. Sad.Here's your (You) I guess.
spics are lucky that brazilians are unambitious self-haterswe never really wanted war or expansion
>>217004335Copehttps://youtu.be/W68zE47k0xw?si=iM2iwN-DA2jkNDz3
Brazil can have until the Darien Gap, everything above that is ours...
>>217004142One 'zil to rule them all... One race... the 'zilian race
>>217004948>How big could Brazil have (realistically) gotten? Uruguay? Northeast Argentina? More of Paraguay during the war? Any of the Guyanas?Uruguay + Paraguay + all the Guyanas + Angola
>>217006746Also Portugal
>>217006847No, not Portugal, because the prevailing sentiment at the time was to prevent reunification with Portugal at all costs. The 1824 constitution even made sure to forbid a dynastic union and anti-Portuguese sentiment was extremely high.
>>217006746Also Bolivia
>>217007265Realistically, no. And even then, it was only a part of it. Thank god it didn't happen.
>>217007293Bolivia is kino. It'd be a great addition to Brazil.
>>217007356Hell no. Some things are better left alone.
>>217004142What do you mean, Latinos and Lusos have zero common vibes despite what the media tells you
>>217007387The image implies brute force, not consent. But I agree with you.
>>217007423I know it's a biased question, but do you guys have the strongest military in Latin America?
>>217007461Yes, but a case could be made for Chile having more modern equipment, despite having a significantly smaller force.
>>217007489Your population has to be like 10x that Chile, unless they can do a Six Day War with overwhelming coordination I think you'd beat them
>>217007500It's all about potential and sustained effort. America started off "weak" against Japan, but then all the industrial output shone through. No modern equipment can beat that.
>>217007367If you could get rid of any state in Brazil, which one would it be and why?
>>217007639Acre, because there's nothing there and the borders would still look decent.
>>217007500You're CIA, you want them to attack other latinamerican countries because you're into lost causes. Instead, the ideal brazilian should become a maoist guerilla and return to urban terrorism.>>217007672You guys should also return Paraguay.
>>217007865Paraguay is already there?
>>217007896They're a brazilian client state.
>>217008000We built the Itaipu Dam which powers their entire country for dirty cheap.
>>217008054You hold massive leverage over them. Same way the USA does with us when there's water shortages.
>>217008054Why didn't you just annex the entirety of Paraguay You're pretty similar racially anyway
>>217008158Only with the Itaipu issue, if anything we're the best neighbor any country could ever wish for.>>217008179Their racial twin is Argentina, which wanted to annex them following the Paraguayan War, and Brazil made sure that never happened (and succeeded).
>>217004142Brazil is rightful Irish clay.
>>217008269Just joking, trying to sound like the american anon who's pushing for expansionism in every reply.>>217008179Thoughts on the USA's renewed aggression towards its neighbors?>>217008298Hy-Brasil is Iceland.
>>217008469Paraguay was indeed a Brazilian protectorate for many years tho. We controled their politics from 1870 to 1876. Uruguay too. But we're good vibes now. Brazilian 19th century foreign policy was all about containing Argentina, securing Paraguay and Uruguay's independence and free navigation of their internal rivers.
>>217004142Golden crown on a golden field, noice
>>217008469>Thoughts on the USA's renewed aggression towards its neighbors?It's only going to lead to more refugees from those countries, so anyone supporting but doesn't also like refugees is retarded
>>217008560I do respect that Brazil's stance on Uruguay has changed, cause it was a Portuguese claim since Colônia do Sacramento, you guys even fought Artigas and then Argentina twice (the last one under the Confederation).
Brazil is about to grow larger. This province of Peru wants to be annexed by Brazil, claiming that the Peruvian government has abandoned them.
>>217008605Bro but this ancient kingdom from 3000 years ago has returned and needs your help both decolonizing and fighting off the saracens!>>217008690Peruvian politics on a saturday night.
>>217008605Retard
>>217008664We did the best we could as a newly independent nation with a 2 million pound debt to Britain, growing internal political strife and strong international pressure to end the naval blockade on Argentina. If we can't have it, then no one else can, so we made it our external goal to make sure Argentina would never annex them (they attempted it aftwards). We defeated Argentina in 1852, toppled their aggressive government, and then Uruguayan independence was secured.
>>217008862I know about those cases, not really that deep into them, I mostly just know about Argentina but rn I bought a book on Latinamerican federalism and the history of how such governments came to be (Mexico, Argentina and Brazil). Still, that last sentence needs more nuance, you helped Argentina's unitarians against the Confederation to weaken it and you still fought to influence Uruguay before the Guerra da Tríplice Aliança
>>217009103We militarily defeated them. Direct military intervention. Urquiza only rose up against Rosas because the Brazilian government guaranteed to support him with all means. Otherwise he'd have never done anything. Rosas declared war on Brazil and had military ambitions over southern Brazil. We sent 16 thousand troops to lift the siege on Montevideo (whose besiegers were backed by Argentina with the ultimate goal of annexing them) and defeated Rosas at Caseros, the Brazilian troops in that battle were the only professional ones. Free navigation was achieved. Argentines cope saying it was a civil war.
kek paraguay almost brought brazil to the brink and this retard is talking like they coulda conquered all of south america
>>217009394All they did was almost getting themselves wiped off the map
>>217008690Idrc about them if I am being honest, Peru is actually just Lima, Cuzco, Ica, Huanuco, Pasco and Arequipa, the rest are just subhumans.
>>217009438it took the mighty brazilian empire years and years to take out a country that didnt even have half a million inhabitants that's the level of impotence we're talking hearit was also a major reason for the collapse of the empire and rise of the coffee and milk (ie femboy) republic
>>217009516You cannot cope so much when your country lost more than half its pre war population and became a puppet state whose very existence depended on someone else's leniency. In practical terms it all lasted just 3 years, 1866-1869.
>>217009442Your people are suffering there due to the lack of infrastructure. They have to get every necessity at the Brazilian side. Develop the region or sell that thing to us already, or you'll lose it anyway someday.
>>217009661>Your peopleThey are not my fellow man; they are nothing, if anything, they are the reason we have filthy coneros. They do not share the same culture as us, and they do not make any effort to fit in with the rest of the country. You can have them, but they will be the same with you as they are with us.
>>217005119I don't have myself, I hate other brazilians.
>>217007639The southern states.They're so much better it's like a whole new country, and they don't deserve to be lumped together with brown retards.
>>217009235It was a civil war, Uruguay, as well as Paraguay and Bolivia were under the same Viceroy in Buenos Aires. The independence movement since the Revolución de Mayo tried to unify these lands but many provinces wanted to either remain Spanish or go with a confederation. The government kept trying to ingrate every remaining part of its claim.The first Viceroy of El Río de La Plata led an invasion to the South of Brazil because those were Spanish claims guaranteed by the Treaty of Tordesillas and by its jurisdiction over the Missions. Borders were still being defined and Brazil-Portugal also fought for those lands just years before.>>217010035It's always pleasant being reminded of how Brazil also has a part of its country on the most extreme north/southeastern point claiming they're more European and developed claiming they're supposed to be independent or some shit, they larp as Cowboys and have barbeque. Following the lost of cause of the República del Rio Grande.
>>217005119>>217010008
>>217010404When a leader of an independent country declares war on another independent country you cannot call that a civil war under any circumstances. Thats just cope from Argentines with a hurt ego.
>>217010566>When a leader of an independent country declares war on another independent country you cannot call that a civil war under any circumstances. Thats just cope from Argentines with a hurt ego.
>>217011406>>>217010566 (You) #>>When a leader of an independent country declares war on another independent country you cannot call that a civil war under any circumstances. Thats just cope from Argentines with a hurt ego.
>>217011502>he thinks he's white.Blacked by Mexico yet again.
>>217011554blacker than you thoughbeit
>>he thinks he's white.>Blacked by Mexico yet again.
>>217011571>>217011623instaraped by the truth
>>217008179Paraguayans have an average admixture of like 60% white 40% indio. Brazilians are like 60% white/mena, 25% African, 15% indio. not exactly the same.
