My theory is that since scandinavia is an isolated, safe, warless peninsula with few people and no wars its population was never under invasion and territorial hostility threats and as result they adopted this sort of communal, matriarchal, pro-social brain that people calls "the longhouse"They actually get their morals and opinions via peer pressure from《The longhouse》 which is basically a communal and collective opinion that comes from above and outside, it's a feminine type of morality.Meanwhile the more masculine Germanics that the romans called the barbarians were very territorial and spirited, being more warriorlike and they were kicked out of the longhouse peninsula because they always wanted to keep expanding and claim more lands. Those would be the Germans, the Anglos, the Franks, the Goths, the Lombards, the Vandals, the Saxons, the Alemanni etc.
>>217048541
>>217048541One of the best known terror attacks in the world ever happened in Oslo almost 15 years ago. Anons still talks about it like it was yesterday
>>217048541>My theory is that since scandinavia is an isolated, safe, warless peninsula with few people and no wars its population was never under invasion and territorial hostility threatshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Weser%C3%BCbunghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Northern_Warhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Swedish_Crusadehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish%E2%80%93Novgorodian_Wars
Check out Swedish history. They chimped out in the 17th century and killed like a third of the population of Poland, Austria and Southern Germany.
>warlessis this nigger serious?
>>217048666And now they're cute twinks who love Somalians and Moroccans :3
>>217048700>>217048666>>217048659These were cabinet wars (mostly kangs using toy soldiers to play chess autistically)When we judge the virility and the strength of character of a people you should look at their general behaviour (Scandinavians are known for being docile and cowardly, they yield quick and work with no stutter, they are no warriors) and historical patterns (people like Russians for example tended to chimp out, being Slavs and cossacks they were chiefly barbarian, and eventually had the first communist revolution of the world slaughtering their own lords for being oppressive, there is no parallels among Scandinavians, they largely accepted oppression from their lords and then, quickly handed power to women)This is why they are quick to accept new foreign rulers (for example now they cowardly yield and attempt to appease Somalian and Syrian invaders, for they are not a warrior people, and expect that being submissive they will met compassion)This is how women thinkEven their speech is passive agressibe
>>217048807t. history illiterate
I do indeed Scandinavia
>>217048807sweden always had the most free society in europe not nearly comparable to the russian system, obedience to authority and laws which the society agrees on is a virtue
>>217048807>outed as a clinical pseud.You're just not cut out for this...
>>217048748What do you mean they? You are nordic
>>217048944Sweden never needed thighs control because precisely they are not under territorial pressure (for example, Russians, Germans, Greeks, Serbians, Spaniards)There are frontiersmen.They live just next to mortal enemies, invading tribes and other barbarians.Their character and culture is formed upon conflict a son of a whore will be bastardized, a promiscuous woman will be shunned, a weak man will be mocked, jokes about rape and dominating other rmen are all over their language because violence is commonplace.These are warrior peoples whose character emerges from conflict, territorial aggressions and tribal conflicts.Russians had to endure the mongols but then clapped back and slaughtered central asia and Siberians.In Sweden they would agree o communal welfare, if another man from the village next door banged their daughter it would represent non-issue for they were all inbreed anyway, they had more space to tolerate these feminine behaviours because their society was more abundant and rewarded pro sociality over antisocial and erratic behaviour
>>217048973Do you actually believe that the Russians that were slaughtering and raping Chechens on camera just a couple decades ago are made of the same wood as swedish cowards that let men from random foreign lands pull to their country and claim land, women and welfare like they wuz Alexander marching into Egypt?These are obviously a high agreeability people that tries to attain peace through submission
>>217048541>>217048807How can someone be so confident and yet so wrong? Peak dunning-krüger
>>217048807utter and complete nonsense in every sentenceyour hot takes are incredibly ignorant, please never post anything again
>>217048944>sweden always had the most free society in europeAbsolutely not.Sweden was a poor shithole ruled by local despots compared to Western Europe for most of its history.The most free societies in Europe were always those surrounding the Alps, the Northern Italian trading republics, the old Swiss cantons and the Southern German free cities.t. Not OP
>>217049235>t. 14 year old.>"These are obviously a high agreeability people that tries to attain peace through submission"This is just babbling at this point.Man, please read something, you're just rambling about shit you clearly know nothing about.
>>217048541Why do you keep spamming these shit threads like this and the argentina one?
>>217049549>>217049464You have provided no refutation as for why they are a effeminate, matriarchal, low agression, bunch of queers otherwise.Nothing on them indicates virility, their men are cowardly and yield to foreigners, their women are slutty and offer themselves to them. These are a people that never had an empire, that never genocided their enemies, that never traded black slaves, that never conquered lands, that never had colonies.These are not conquerors, warriors or imperialists. These are just longhoused peasants
>>217048541My theory is that you're brown and retarded, and this thread is my evidence. Case closed, thank you for your attention everyone.
>>217049609Im getting under your skin by presenting as pseudish.The point is to make you open to read and engage, which you wouldnt if the presenration was hostile and i straight uo said "i think nordics are gay faggots because their societies are commie longhouses"
I hate it when colonials share their retarded opinions on anything related to Europe.
>>217049713Because you descend from petty peasants too bitchmade to conquer other lands.Be born under the yoke and rot under it.
>>217048541they act like a wolfpack you monkeybrained retard, you do not stand out from a pack in -30 cold and polar nights where food is scarce
>>217049656Bigger dicks than your little indio pecker tho
>>217048541biggest slut of homofascistic Russia
>>217049769A wolf pack would be something like the yamnaya or the sintasha.The closest in europe today are the irish travellers.These were very territorial but also hyper patriarchal and rapists.If you were to name a state that mimics the yamnaya would be russia with their erratic and agressive behaviourThe northerners act like a longhouse, more like the farmers
>>217049702You're not getting under anyone's skin, you just come across as a reddit middleschooler.The Swedish and Danish kingdoms (which by extension includes Norway) are not exceptionalist cases of perfect societies. You'd know that if you knew a thing or two rather than going by vibes and twitter memes.
>>217049800>yamnaya is russia o algo
>>217049580what you said is true in addition to the frisian freedom period of frisia , but still sweden was substantially more free surrounding big kingdoms
>>217049823Whoever said anything about perfect societies?It is no secret that different enviromental and sociopolitical pressures mold different adaptative strategies.People from mountains tends to be hyper territorial (caucasians, central asia highlanders, tibetans, greeks, balkan slavs, albanians) because there is a resource scarcity and favour goes to those groups that practice the most strict endogamy to mantain themselves.Other societies adopt other group strategies, and this shapes their character
>>217049774Seethe
>>217048541You obviously know nothing about Scandinavian history, we fought each other all the time.
>>217049942Aren't "longhouse" matriarchal/communal societies just chud lingo for the stereotypical "leftist utopias"? What are you even referring to, then? Seems like your description of these countries is just a right-wing perspective of the surface level "free healthcare happiest countries in the world" vibes that so many criticize leftkiddies for having.
>>217050206You've written 5 pages of crying seethe thus far, did a Swede steal your woman. You also made crying report because my comment on your little asiatic pecker hurt you so bad.
>>217048807he hated him because the spoke the truth
>>217049464It's a special brand of rationalists who think they can unlock all the truths of the universe by just thinking really really hard about something and using common sense. No need for data
>>217048807You're so fucking retarded.
>>217048541didn't argentina get annihilated by a weak as piss collapsing britain, all for some tiny islands
>>217048944We were in the iron grip of the swede. Only when we were under the Russian rule we had more autonomy.
>>217050412No, longhouse is Lingo for matriarchy, which yes, is somewhat communal (property rims not private, the things on the longhouse are attained by reputation and reputation is bond to peer pressure, they are communal, primitive societies with shared property and a shared arrangement of land)Whorehouses are a type of longhouse, women taking care of each other with the major hierachy being subgroups of age, but overall don't tend to partake in the same type of domination and power dynamics as men, instead they browbeat each other and delay aggression under many layers of sophistry, communication, gossip, lie and rumors prioritizing types of pro social collaborationWomen are inherently more leftist, that strategy allowed them to survive under the condition of spoil of war (confrontative women would get killed or get their offspring offed by their captors) so that's the extent where you could maybe apply that
>>217050792This is some whatifalthist tier schizo babbling
>>217049580What local despots? We never had feudalism
>>217050805Will you really deny your society and people is effeminate? I'm pretty sure the internet is full of tabloid articles CELEBRATING how feminist and gay you guys areYou are not a spirited people inclined to arts and conquest like the Greek or italians, thats obvious, you get your morals and values from outside, from the surrounding society.
>>217050792>Whorehouses are a type of longhouse, women taking care of each other with the major hierachy being subgroups of age, but overall don't tend to partake in the same type of domination and power dynamics as men, instead they browbeat each other and delay aggression under many layers of sophistry, communication, gossip, lie and rumors prioritizing types of pro social collaboration.Peak retardation.
>>217050895>the internet is full of tabloid>tabloidargentinians really are retarded.
>>217050914Do you think women socialize the same way as men?Do you believe the type of gametes we produce by size, output and frequency does not shape behaviour?
>>217049151Nordics outside of Denmark never even had feudalism you braindead pseud retard. Unlike literally every other nation you mentioned. The farmer was too independant. He didn't even pay taxes. That's why the crown was so poor and had to depend on constant wars for money and gifting of estates. Serfdom never existed here. One google search away that would have taken you 5 seconds before spewing out your verbal diarreah cuck fantasies. Kill yourself favela monkey
>>217048541>its population was never under invasion and territorial hostility threats
>>217050980>Saaaar we are masculine and patriarchal this is all paki lies saaaar
>>217051074Historically, yes. I don't even think the most extreme feminist would claim that Scandinavia was a matriarchy
>>217051074did all the intelligent argentinians get killed by the british?
>>217048666We helped, Hakkapeliitta :D HAKKAA PÄÄLLE POHJAN POIKA
>>217051167>649 killedThat's very likely
>>217051167It is very easy to notice how you refuse to disavow the effeminacy
My city (and several others) were literally invaded and burnt by Russia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Pillage_of_1719%E2%80%931721
>>217050895It is a recent development. If you go back to ancient times when Greeks were still relevant they were infinitely more effeminate than us.We're also not that unique, all of Northwestern Europe could be considered extremely gay and feminine compared to thirdies.
>>217051186>their leader was a Swedish general from Västergötlandoof
>>217048541Female foreign minister of Sweden is nagging EU countries.
>>217051248The EU is a yet bigger longhouse
>>217051213>doesn't deny that all intelligent argentinians got killed in the falklandsisn't argentina plagued by men becoming femboy trannies?
>>217051246Almost like were colonized by you more than 700 years. You need to pay reperations timmyson
I sort of admire how the argentinian trolled all those nordics so hard.
>>217051237In america one of the most liberal white American groups (as opposed to the more territorial anglo types, especially the anglos from Scottish and Welsh periphery) I'm are the swedish Americans.Particularly notorious in the matriarchal state of Minnesota.There is something genetically wrong about Scandinavians.You are like those animals that never had a predator and get obliterated as soon as you introduce a cat or something that silly to their enviromentLiterally prey
>>217051398>he's not actually this retarded haha.. right?
>>217051426Didn't you turn 70% brown and went from the richest country in the world to a third world slum in a single generation?
>>217051448I feel like a Russian would know Scandinavian history a little bit better. This is a pure bred Brown White surpremacist Latinxo
>>217051426Rural Minnesota is deeply republican and rural Minnesotans are more Swedish than the cityfags. North Dakota too has alot of Swedes, again deeply republican.
>>217051509No, he's a Russian, he admitted it in another thread.
>>217051509If I were a white supremacist why would I be shitting on you
>>217051591Are you shitting on us? Your train of thought isn't easy to follow
>>217051612That's what the general tone of your post conveyed
>>217051013faggot, whorehouse dynamics are shaped sex peonage and complete subservience to men, even if the pimp is a woman.Do you realize that for most of human history harems were handled by eunuchs because women weren't trusted to take care of each other? You don't know shit of what you're talking about, how do "gametes" vary by output??? What does that even mean, lmao.
>>217048541Your take makes sense. I mean even if you compare them with my current place, they essentially did not have strong evolutionary selection, whereas over the millennia we have had empire after empire.Probably I can easily beat any of them 1vs1 and take their women.
>>2170517411- pimping is not the same as courtesan whorehouse patronage, even within limping there is systems of favour and communal care within whorehouses generally to exclusion of men.Harem eunuchs are a phenomenon limited to some cultures in some historical contexts and not pervasive (castration wasn't even tolerated in all cultures with harem. For one)North American indigenous communities and many neolithic communities had short lived matriarchies with communal ownership and communal land holdouts Much like the commons, except they were mediated precisely by a favour and patronage system sustained by peer pressure and gossip and predominantly enacted by females.Again. Men and females are not the same. The root of the private property and individual household ownership is the patriarchal nuclear family model.Also your second question has no coherence.The way gametes are produced (monthly vs daily, thousands vs single cell, impregnation vs reception, egg vs sperm) defines reproductive strategy.And thus. Sociality.Reproduction is not such a major burden in abundant and low adaptative pressure societies.Thus allowing for more feminine societies to thrive
>>217051823You're the size of a paper clip >not me thoughOk you're not representative of your cunt, mr 170cm 65kg "man". You'de unironically stand level with a middle schooler here
>>217051886>The root of the private property and individual household ownership is the patriarchal nuclear family model.You mean the model that has been dominant in Germanic countries for thousands of years?
>>217051987>links random twitter faggot>calls it proofthe falklands really did a number on argentinas iq.
>>217052161The image comes from a poll.Scandivians are genetically defective While in the rest of Europe there seems to be some fascist fever Scandinavians seem to be lining up to bow before their new arab masters as they vote some leftist party.That's not normal masculine behaviour
>>217051432He is mostly right but I'd like to be proven wrong nontheless
>>217052254>not denying that the british killed all the intelligent argentinians
>>217052313You have been proven wrong several times. You have made claims about Scandinavia that are demonstrably false, and you haven't even tried to argue for them
>>217049656>These are a people that never had an empire, that never genocided their enemiesthis is bait
>>217048541That's not your theory
>>217052369But you never had territorial skirmishes for land and women like the ones on the European plain or other borderlands.Even England had intense territorial tension with the Britons (including but not limited to the Welsh) and the Gaels (same w scots)
>>217052565territorial disputes like argentinians being slaughtered in the falklands?
The only reason these countries are successful is because they were mostly untouched by ww2
What is with the slew of Argie posts with god awful barely informed takes on Europe? Is it the same anon? Did a zoomer Jeet weasle his way into Argentina? VPN?
>>217052565We lost half the country to Russia, lost 15% of our population just as draftees (30% total) in the wars of Karl XII, had constant border wars with Denmark, was conquered by Denmark after they beheaded every noble in the country, etc etc. There's nothing special about our history in relation to other euro cunts besides the lack of feudalism stemming from farmers supplanting the role kept by lords in other kingdoms
>>217052713Reading is for faggot nerds lol.It's better to act confrontational to upset other people with pedantic claims just to get corrected and try to defend your claims with quick reads.is better to learn from scrutiny
>>217052894>reading is for faggotsI wouldn't expect any other take from an argentinian that pissed himself when his brother got shot by brits.
>>217052761Of course but these were very isolated and more wartime events.I refer to high population density and low resource availability leading to raids, pillaging and so forth.Did you had commons in scandinavia?To share property and commons entails certain level of trust that can only be attained if the society practices morality, morality in this particular case referring to an external "guilt" browbeaten into existence by perr pressure.External morality imposed from an abstract, as opposed to more scammy, less cooperative and more antisocial honor culture where trust dissolves in favour of competition.
>>217048541>My theory is that since scandinavia is an isolated, safe, warless peninsula with few people and no wars its population was never under invasion and territorial hostility threats and as result they adopted this sort of communal, matriarchal, pro-social brain that people calls "the longhouse"sounds good. too bad, these aren't our scandinavians. maybe, somewhere in a parallel universe, such peace-loving people exist
>>217053221>no wars its population was never under invasion and territorial hostility threats>very isolated and more wartime eventsyou're contradicting yourself falklands boy
>>217048541They were all except Sweden literally invaded and occupied within living memory, you daft bugger.
>>217053533t. Paki and Indian :DFuck u also Finland is not scandi
>>217053337There weren't cumans, huns, mongols or any other group of those characters invading SwedenNeither were there conflicts between broadly different tribes competing for land like there were between celts and Germanics during the migration era.There weren't extended periods of invasion and conflict with deep consequences to daily life.Just isolated wartime events. Nothing deep cutting to reshape society.Promiscuity and more liberalized norms are probably to support lower confrontation and higher trust.Because everyone can broadly be integrated into the same tribe without friction as they are all inbreed. There is a higher stake in being tolerant than being antisocial, in rehabilitating a thief than killing them to not show a lack of resolve.And this is fundamentally because it was a fairly homogeneous society.If you won't cut the hand of a thief from mother tribe, in a more mixed society, you show weakness, and that will be judged and receive according responsesAlso why do you keep bringing the islands no one cares about that irl
>>217053691your aware that we are ancient siberian like sami folk, there never was actual mongolians in Finland.Imagine riding a horse in labyritnh of thick forests, swamps and lakes.Mongols and huns prefered plains.Cant find em here
>>217053691>moving the goalpostsnice try. you subhumans seem to really care about the falklands whenever it's brought up. You're obsession with war seems to be some lingering need to deny that you're britains bitch.
>>217053784You come from seima-turbino mongoloids
>>217053841Not really, we are Ancient siberian who bleached themselves with yamna, proto-balt and proto scandi.
>>217053221>high population density and low resource availabilityThese are by their very nature exclusionary. Historically speaking high population density came to be from resource abundance and a stable communal system that didn't let quarrels devolve into armed conflicts. Border skirmishes and cattle theft takes place in the wastelands. Not inner China. China has millions of people living in relative peace with eachother through effective farming and a solid state. Scandinavia is historically speaking a decentralized grouping of farmers (outside of Denmark which was far more like countries like Germany). They were independent family units who carved out a living on meagre soil out in the woods and traded cows with eachother. There was no central authority that kept the law. The crown didn't have the money for it since farmers didn't pay taxes. Scandinavians are historically akin to woodland critters living in hills that no one wanted. This fostered a strong sense of what is in modern terms called protestant work ethic. Whatever phenomena concerning masculinity and feminimity or whatever other buzzword you're obsessed with i can't help you with. I seriously doubt that whatever it might be can be traced back to cabbage farmers starving to death due to bad weather every other decade.
>>217048541Good. Who the fuck wants to come up here and conquer this place anyway? It's already -30. This frozen rock is not worth conquering
>>217054088the germans
>>217054150No. They just wanted Swedish iron. Nothing more. They didnt want this land. There is nothing here for them. There is fuck all here except for oil. And thats a new thing. It will be gone soon
>>217054088this is pretty much trueeven immigrants move out from where I live because the weather is too bad for themI'd like some company desu, but people just can't take the winter
>>217054260what about heavy water :D biggest norwegian war story ever told.You should take their gratitude, look europe now the were worshipping u but you let communism win.t. Honorary Aryan
>>217054010>These are by their very nature exclusionary.They are not exclusionary, they precisely devolve in quarrels, thievery, aggression and competition for land and resources.To accept longhousing means to accept in a certain point to not break boundaries of social trust, this is especially important in places with unowned land that belongs to no lordship. Like commons. Because it is what sets the boundaries.In societies where more people can be considered to belong to a common, or at least compatible set of groups that might mingle, they are favoured because individual misconduct does not lead to organized exploitation as there is no competition between different subgroups engaging in these misconducts.In these environments pro social behaviour thrives. There is few boundaries to be respected and there is a broader set of public goods to be shared.it is favoured to be less territorial and less aggressive.Trusting others can be favorable when the others are trustworthyLike with your family. The degree of familiarity that is to be accepted is then set selectively Does it matter more to conform the longhouse norms, the norms of your nuclear family, or your own? Different societies with different types of familiarity might approach that differently
>>217054518how many of your faggot family members died in the falklands? is that why you're a femboy now?
>>217054518We didn't have communal ownership, atleast not of land. Each peasant toiled his own fields that he personally owned or he toiled the fields that belonged to someone else.
>>217054686The forests? The lakes? Who owned that? They were likely commons You cannot just assault people, that's not normal, But in many societies it happens and it's tolerated in scale. It is less tolerated in societies where public goods are owned as a way to mantain harmony, moreso if there is abundance of them to exploit.This is not the mentality in borderlands, where aggressive antisociality is commonplaceIn borderlands people organizes like gypsies, or in broader groups.Your society is less adapted to antisocial alien groups
>>217054910>Your society is less adapted to antisocial alien groupsIf you mean pretntious southern european oligarchs, then yesThey'd find a hard time adjusting to society here, we'd happily drain them for money though
>>217054910>antisocial alien groupslike femboy argentinians with ptsd from being fucked in the ass by the brits?
>>217054910>Your society is less adapted to antisocial alien groups
>>217054952You sound like a vagina and a pair of tits Incredible.
>>217055145not even real norwegian women can be as feminine and womanly as you
>>217055145High-ranking southern europeans are the worst people you'll meet on earth
>>217055342>>217055435Ill grab you by the pussy
>>217054910>The forests?Sometimes commons, sometimes not.>The lakes?Nobody owns lakes anywhere.And neither is anywhere near as relevant as arable land.
>>217055504you'd sure like to wouldn't you faggot. I'd be happy to fuck you in your womanly ass to make you forget about britain.
>>217054518They are exclusionary. Sweden has a low population density due to resource scarcity. India has a high population due to resource abundance. No one lives on Greenland due to there being no resources there. If there were, there would be more than 30k people there. Countries like Egypt, China and France dominated their neighbours through their ability feed great big civilizations. Their rigid legal systems and communities and obeyed the central authority ensured peace domestically while being organized enough to raise armies of thousands that laid decentralized neighbours in the ground. They were law abiding, bootlicking, communal worshipping faggots. And thats why manly, raiding sheep thiefs got annihilated by them and hid in shitholes like Scandinavia, Caucasus, Mongolia, Sahara
>>217051908>Ok you're not representative of your cunt, mr 170cm 65kg "manYour ancestors 1500 years ago during the migration period (when they were wilder and stronger germanic barbarians) lost to my ancestors(Huns).I'm like a wild wolf who has been fighting for food since childhood, killing to eat, and you're a domestic husky who grew up in warmth and abundance and is fed for free every day.We are not the same.
>>217051384Das rite. Finland is an honorary POC country. Svens need to pay up.
>>217048541accurate
>>217048541This 10000%
>>217048541>never under invasion and territorial hostility threatsDenmark and Sweden has been fighting more wars against each other than probably any other countries.And Denmark had wars with Germany. They took south Jutland and we got it back after ww1.You should learn the history of Scandinavia before you talk about it.
OP is correct. There is an intense hivemind culture of conformity and submission in Scandinavia and especially Sweden. This is how you get the Swedish zoomer wojak meme. They all dress, act, and think the same because the pressure to conform is more extreme than other white nations. There are very few subcultures outside the moral boundaries of Swedish society unlike Angelo countries which have much more diverse subcultures. Swedes look to people in positions of authority in their own society to tell them what to think, how to behave, how to dress, what music they should like, and what to believe. It's a communal consensus driven culture where the societal norms are pushed from the top down and you have mass submission from the populace. Swedes don't ask what idea is right or wrong?, they ask "what idea will let me fit in?" and "what idea will let me get ostracized?".As to why they are like this, it could be 1. Because they were always a high trust homogeneous country, so they could always trust their leaders until recently2. They evolved in a cold harsh climate and needed the group to survive to a much greater degree than other races.3. They have never been invaded by non-white armies before so they have never had to think about non-whites and therefore never developed an immune system against them.For the reasons above they never developed an immune system against violent, low IQ, and low trust brown third worlders. Letting brown people into Sweden is like unleashing a wolf into a chicken coop.
>>217048541the fuck are you smoking, nigga?
>>217060252so it's kind of like canada then? full of street shitters, but too pussy to get rid of them because they might look racist. Run by fag libs too.
>>217060328Not entirely, Canadians have a different identity than Europeans and many genuinely believe in the nation of immigrants thing. It's also much harder to get everybody to act as a group because of the greater degree of individualism. Swedes obey out of fear of not fitting in. This is common everywhere but it's not as powerful a factor in Australia, Canada, or even Austria.
sweden castrated people for being genetically undesirable just one century ago. you'd be surprised at how recently the change in moralities occurred
>>217058797Das rite, we are only innocent in North
>>217048541>isolated, safe, warless peninsula with few people and no wars its population was
>>217060416Morality is pushed top down in their culture. If their leaders became Nazis they would become such fervent believers of Nazism that they would make 1940s Germans blush. It just depends on who is in charge.
>>217051225doxxed
>>217060252>>217060399Making stuff up is fun and all especially when it supports your silly narrative but you're just outright wrong
>>217048541I think you might be trying too hard and just have an inferiority complex.
>>217060587It's hard to measure individualism but new world Anglo states are definitely in the lead. Britain itself is more individualistic than other European countries. Even white nationalists in America list hyper-individualism as one of the leading reasons as to why their movement won't get off the ground.>The same applies culturally as well to the idea of community. Most Americans do not know their neighbors. Most Americans get offended by small talk by cashiers. Talking to someone in small talk on the street in many major cities is seen as deeply creepy and offensive. In US schools, from our memories, teachers will openly teach to view those within your community as “competitors” with a very hostile attitude to it.>This culture of hyper-individualism over the past 20 years has gotten to its absolute worst. Where now the average American is rather spending double the money on McDonald’s by having some crackhead leave it at their door to avoid interacting with anyone at all.Read the full thing here.https://americanfuturist.net/american-psychosis/Americans and new worlders in general have a weaker racial identity, believe in multiculturalism to a greater extent than euros, and are more individualistic making it harder to get them to organize. Swedes don't act nearly entirely out of fear of ostracism which they likely evolved because Sweden is a cold harsh climate where survival depends on the group.Here is a map of Europe showing Britain as the most individualistic country. Americans and Canadians are even more individualistic than Brits. It's very obvious when you talk to white Americans they are all different from one another where as when you talk to Swedes they are all the same.
>>217060898>Most Americans get offended by small talk>americanfuturist.netEnough of /int/ for me for the day
>>217061052There is a reason all young swedes dress like this and act the same. Sweden is a consensus driven, communal, and conformist, obedient society. Swedes trust and obey authority to a far greater degree than Americans and new worlders in general. Not being able to notice that shows lack of pattern recognition skills and low IQ.
>>217049609You're talking to a Russian. He seethes about Europeans all the time under an Argie flag
Do not engage in this thread
Why are they like this
>>217060898Pefect balanceVideo related, adult anglo gets beated by some 15 year old kid :DKnow ur place
>>217061094>having a functioning society instead of le new worlder disobedient warriors is badThere's also a reason why most gore videos come from the new world. It's also low IQ to not to see the irony in collectively claiming your own superiority in the name of individualism of your country :D
>>217061342https://i.ylilauta.org/f7/a1/f7a18189c79bb570.mp4heres that video of anglo getting shown his place
>>217061342>>217061347>>217061360Swedes are dying out the fastest and are the most cucked people in Europe because of their consensus driven and conformist culture. No other country in Europe is in such a dire situation. We are dying out too but we had a different identity to begin with and it's for other reasons making organization harder. 95% of the reason Swedes don't act is because they are terrified of not fitting in. This fear as nowhere near as strong in Canada or America which has a diverse range of lifestyles with no issue.
>>217061507good thing im not swede
>>217061507There are chuds in every country including Sweden. Being seen as a racist is bad in the west including Canada. There are more non-whites in Canada and US than in any Euro country (excluding France maybe). You’re simply just chudded beyond repair. Wake up buddy
Don't get the point of these threads when everyone understands that it's Russia. It's like regularly shoving a "Russia sucks" sign in people's faces.
>>217061719The same stuff applies in Finland. >>217061728Sweden is the least white country in Europe. It's happening for different reasons here because of our history. Most people think you can be non-white and be Canadian. No one thinks you can be non-white and Swedish or any other European.
>>217061920>the least white country in europethat would be turkey
>>217062143Turkey is not in Europe, but some tards want it to be, so it's an edge case regardless
>>217061920Silencoid sandniggerFinns are among white balts whitest euros, just not in ur copemode that includes sandnigger neolithic farmers.
