>>217159779
Inb4 someone calls me a simp but female mutilation is 1000 times worse than circumcision but for some reason ifs the latter everyone cries about

>>217159838
it's the same thing. Whether or not the clitoris is removed is not even covered under the term since any female circumcision is considered FGM

>>217159838
kek what? Absolutely nobody cries about male genital mutilation in real life.
FGM is banned in every nearly non-muslim country and people still cry about it happening even in countries that it is banned in.
But not a single peep about little baby boys being strapped down to a medieval torture device and mutilated in supposed "civilized" countries.

One being "worse" doesn't matter in any way. Genital mutilation is bad and should be fought against regardless of if it is a male or female genital being butchered.

>>217162214
>kek what? Absolutely nobody cries about male genital mutilation in real life.
yes, because we live in a misandric world
i cry for my american frens every day

>>217159779
It's halal o algo

>>217162214
Unexpected post + flag combo. Good job, Mr. Burger

>>217159779
Women with sexual ability cheat more for chad so that has to be neutralized to preserve the family unit

>>217159779
now post a map of male genital mutilation (circumcision)

>>217162214

>>217162214
This
The WHO won't even call it by its real appellation i.e genital mutilation

Egyptian anons?

>>217159838
also a lot of female circumcisions are less invasive than the male variant, but please, don't cut up a baby's genitals
>i have a knife in my hand, that baby is strapped down, it's screaming. though luck pal
>before i proceed, is it a boy or a girl?
see the blatant double standard?

>>217159838
could that be because its much less common?

>>217159838
now that i'm at it
>your genital mutilation is ok because mine was worse (often it isn't)
what kind of reasoning is this even. can i waterboard you because the holy book said so because pulling fingers nails out is worse?
not torturing children too spicey for thirdies and americans

>>217162214
i agree, my post was badly worded, both female and male should be banned. im no medical professional, maybe theres some circumstances where circumcision is logical, but doing it just for the sake should be illegal

>>217159779
What is sex like after this for women? I assume they feel 90% less pleasure?

>>217163715
they feel almost nothing. a circumcized person is closer to uncircumcized than a mutiliated woman in terms of pleasure

>>217164456
don't muslims prescribe pouring sand into a woman's vagina before raping her so she doesn't feel pleasure lol

test

Going on the VPN to post some esoteric knowledge.
Female circumcision is not what you think.
It does not remove female pleasure.
First of all there's three kinds:
- Just cutting the excess of the lips and the clotorial hood as done by arabs: This actually INCREASES feeling.
- Cutting the actual external clitoris as in Ethiopia / Somalia. This reduces the feeling but basically makes bitches extremely horny all the time cause it's super hard for them to cum (not impossible).
If you haven't had fucked a circumcised girl you are missing out.
As usual, the Orient pities us.

>>217159838
Tf you on about retard, nobody ever says anything about circumcision, and people whine about fgm all the time even though it's only a problem in third world shitholes

>>217159838
Everyone knows that, and outside of 4chan it's not at all a controversial statement. But that doesn't mean that MGM isn't a bad thing. "Cutting off an arm is worse than cutting off a finger. Therefore, cutting off a finger is okay." Not that you're arguing this, but I've seen people assert logic along those lines.