imagine if that was a bubble but it probably isn't haha

>>217163721
Dot com bubble generated no money, the AI models like ChatGPT Pro cost $200/month.

>>217163854
oh so this time it's no bubble

>>217163854
That's not nearly enough to cover costs

>>217163854
they lose money even on the 200/month plans. OpenAI burned 12 billion in 3 months last quarter.

>>217163672
they did. remember what happened?

>>217163854
For people who speculate sure it was a bubble, but e-commerce definitely didn't disappear the Internet was fully integrated into society after the 'bubble'. Citing the dot com bubble doesn't exactly make me think AI will become irrelevant.

>>217163721
Some tech companies and especially American ones are overvalued currently but data centers in general are useful. Everything happens digitally these days so we cannot do anything without data centers.

>>217164972
Long $PLTR!

>>217164839
wdym its already irrelevant

>>217163672
They can, it would just cause all the land lords and boomers to lose money