[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1719240356062135.jpg (227 KB, 1080x1350)
227 KB
227 KB JPG
Isn't funny how china has built more infraestructure in africa in 10 years than the west in 100 years?
>>
>>217167967
The West should not have ended colonialism in Africa. They literally cannot rule themselves in the modern world and now the continent is left open for China to exploit.
>>
File: images.jpg (16 KB, 201x251)
16 KB
16 KB JPG
the west was too busy lecturing africans on feminism
>>
>>217168016
how bout brown people colonizing white nations?
>>
>>217168022
Of all the dumb decisions a westoid politician can make, being averse to feminism and foid worship is literal career suicide
>>
>>217168138
You can only call it colonization when it's a superior culture (in multiple respects) invading an inferior one.
>>
>>217169351
Do you mean chinese culture?

Because chinese culture is superior to european.
>>
>>217167967
They're building our East Coast Railway Link but our Public Works Dept is keeping them honest to ensure it meets international engineering standards.
>>
>>217167967
Not true. All the infastructure that the west built has just not been maintained and long sense destroyed.

Considering the quality of chinese infrastructure you can expect the same, probably within a decade or two.
>>
>>217170017
have you looked at your flag?
>>
>>217170070
Yeah, last I checked our bridges don't collapse the same year they're constructed like in china
>>
File: 1737764189436368.jpg (70 KB, 640x640)
70 KB
70 KB JPG
>>217170017
>>217170191
your infraestructure is literally from the 1950-1960.
>>
>>217170915
And infrastructure lasting going on a century is bad why?
>>
>>217167967
>Why did China build more infrastructure than countries did 100+ years ago
I wonder
>>
Isn't funny how you can have people agreeing with any of your arbitrary made-up claims by loading a question and appealing to their pre-existent biases?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.