The Mexican revolution was the worst thing to happen to Mexico.Over a million died in the revolution. It was chaos. I ran the numbers and if Mexico had stable rule and never went through multiple lost decades of growth mexico would be far richer, over twice as wealthy per capital (gdp per capital similar to countries like Greece, Poland, or Hungary) and have many millions more people because of the compounding growth.
>>217171715Wow, the world dodged a bullet.
The mexican revolution was based as fuck, and it was the event that turned Mexico into a real country and not just another sudaca hellhole awaiting for a supreme leader to fix all problemsGlazing Diaz is peak brown activities btw
My great grandma killed a man with her bare hands during the revolution, he tried to rape her.
what even happened in the revolution anyway
>>217173283Not as cool as the 2027 revolution against sheinbaum
It was a bourgeoisie civil war, carried out in order to update the capitalist mode of production. Porfirism favored the Hacienda, which was based on rudimentary agricultural methods. The revolutionists wanted an industrial-based capitalism. The revolution gave us things such as as a working code, social security, nationalized industries, but it also reinforced mexican dependency on the core's countries capital, just in other forms.
>>217173408Mainly mexicans fought for the right to own the land they worked, on top of dismantling a dictatorship whose main concern was making the capital look like Paris
>>217173455based then
>>217173490>>217173408It wasn't coherent at all. The revolution was a band of robbers, liberals, socialists, etc.... it was among the most chaotic period of mexico and lasted a couple decades and had some of the most batshit leaders, like socialists who imposed extreme anti Catholic policies on a 90%+ Catholic nation that predictably led to revolts. Keep in mind it resulted in mass famine, economic ruin, and 1.5 million dead huge number. Back then mexico had slightly less than 15 million so this has caused missing millions.>>217173283Stability and order is what builds countries. Porfirio is not perfect but was better than what was to come. A good, developmental leader is what results in good outcomes. There was no reason mexico could not have experienced steady growth and been an industrial powerhouse if there had not been decades of ruin
>>217171715>>217173283A year or two back there was a Mexican slut on /b/ posting nudes and taking requests from anons to write on her body. I got her to write 'I love Porfirio Diaz' and 'I love James K. Polk' on her belly where her womb is. I wish I saved those photos
>>217174051>The revolution was a band of robbers, liberals, socialists, etc.... it was among the most chaotic period of mexico and lasted a couple decades and had some of the most batshit leaders, like socialists who imposed extreme anti Catholic policies on a 90%+ Catholic nationThere's not a single thing in this entire paragraph which I have a problem with. The Mexican revolution is based for the same reason as the Russian revolution. Let the sons of the petty bourgeois, peasants, and workers unite to bash in the heads of the comically rich mistreates of society if that remains the sole method of creating change. Also the cristeros were not just anti-atheism like how you portray them, they wanted a fucking religious dictatorshipThe rise of the PRI is the only reason why Mexico isn't in even worse straits - imagine the cartels being given actual political legitimacy by the caudillo government as strongman enforcers with a license to commit violence and sell drugs
Yea, but jelly commies ruined everything good.
