[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>be me
>want to get my brain juicing
>start reading books that have won the Nobel Prize in literature
>since these represent the best writing of humanity as a collective every year
>start reading
>half the shit is garbage

???
>>
Reading made up bullshit != Reading*

*Reading means reading non-fiction to learn skills

Reading = reading novels is what women believe

Reading = Gathering otherwise hard to come by information at an accelerated rate is what high IQ individuals like my myself intuitively understand at a young age.

Since I had to explain this to you I have bad news.
>>
>since these represent the best writing of humanity as a collective every year
Your mistake is assuming humanity still exists. Whatever humanity we had died in 1945 which is the year of victory of Satan. The only books worth reading published after that were written by authors born way before that date like Hemingway or Faulkner
>>
>>217205749
Thoughts on Steinbeck?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.