China wins (again)
surely this will save their birth rate in 2 more weeks
>>217641642Incredibly based actually
The party has declared war on the femcel. Casualties will be in the tens of millions. The Mandate of Heaven will be lost.
>>217641642Good. The west is so naive and stupid when it comes to this. Of course no one wants to have kids if they are fed sitcom slop for the last 30 years that tell them to party and live like bachelors into their 30s (just to mention one among many harmful cultural pushes).
>>217641642based>>217641822kek seethe
>>217641642They are the literal creators of this wth.
>>217642163kek
>>217642192>has mutts saved on his computer and ready to use because he has no argument about the fact that chinas birth rate has never been improvingkek seethe
>>217642163>>217642240At least China tries to solve its birth rate problem, the West is too infested with feminism to try to do so
>>217642240>>has mutts saved in his countrykek
>>217642385mutts will inherit the earth
>>217642434>mutts will inherit his countrykek
>>217642475chinese women love creating hapa mutts with white guys btw
Do China have even a problematically high rate of women with zero children? We don't - the issue is a large proportion who would have had large families in the past now stop at one. Banning womanslop won't change that
>>217642549>the issue is a large proportion who would have had large families in the past now stop at one.Make all women who didn't suffer from reproductive problems in their fertile years, who have less than 2 children ineligable for pensions.
>>217642591nta but on some level there needs to be some realization that if GDP is a metric overly reliant on stimulus then so is any market interest in people. We keep talking about fertility, but no one gives a reason why apart from GDP. If there's no jobs to give people then what purpose would a system want for more? This was one of the earliest critiques of modernity, but it still stands if a system doesn't see a need for people then people alienate themselves. The only thing at fault here is lack of interest and enjoyment from both parties.
>>217642591Chinese pensions are already miserly. Cost of having a kid especially in an urban area is way higher than the cost of an annuity that's better than you'd get from the government
>>217642519>t.kek
>>217642706Also even if that weren't the case this is a threat to maybe pay you less forty years in the future which is on a longer time horizon than most people are operating on and is inherently non-credible since no government, not even a Leninist one, is actually going to let old people starve on the street en masse
>>217642723dont worry bro china's birth rate can still be saved with a government mandated bwc operation. they care about their people
>>217642936>t.
