The Beachy Head Lady was not black!https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440325002948
no one caressage btw
i care
>>217677357Me and him >>217677388 do, doe.
>>217676842What is this?
>>217676842The reality is racist
>>217676842I called this the moment that slop 'British people used to be niggers!' article first came out.
>>217677693The first Black Briton o algo.t.libtard archaeologist
even if she were black skinned, she would rather be of another branch of the mainstream Eurasians, with her male relatives belonging to haplogroup C.not likely a subsaharan.
>>217678019The point is not accurate genetic identification but to try and yet again humiliate and disparage native British people. Academics in this country are utter vermin.
>>217677766wait, people think out of africa was like this recent and like 20% of world history was played using actors with brown skin?
>>217678125>people think out of africa was like this recentThe academics and media figures that know better don't think this, however they intentionally obfuscate the reality to let low information people believe stuff like this. They are mainly trying to force the meme that Europe has always been full of Black Africans and Middle Easterners therefore you have no right to complain about the infinity asylum seekers coming in to the country because it's always been like that. Obviously none of that is true and they know that, but they like to spread the meme.
>>217678125>o algo
>>217677766>BBC propagandaThey can't keep getting away with this
>>217678386Kek
>>217678221She was Middle Eastern doe (Cypriot)
>>217678639https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440325002948
>>217677766oddly reminiscent of the dinosaur shrink wrapping phenomenahttps://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/tetrapod-zoology/dinosaurs-and-the-anti-shrink-wrapping-revolution/
>>217678639no, that was an unpublished result apparently that will likely never be published now, she was fully northwestern european genetically
>>217677766cracka trynna rewrite black history of excellence
>>217678639>BHW was shown to carry a mitochondrial haplotype deriving from the K1a haplogroup (K1a26; Q = 82 %). This haplogroup is associated with modern-day populations from Northern European and the British Isles, and identified in several individuals from rural Iron Age Britain (Scheib et al., 2024; Schiffels et al., 2016).>Initial f3-outgroup analysis using modern human individuals (qp3Pop{BHW, modern population, Mbuti/Chimp}) show BHW to have a strong affinity to modern day Europeans (Fig. 3a), and the highest genetic affinity to modern individuals from Great Britain (Fig. 3b).>PCA (Fig. 3b) shows BHW is most similar to modern populations from Western Europe, with no attraction towards sub-Saharan Africans. The projection of additional Roman-era individuals (Fig. 3c) highlights the association between the ancestry of BHW and populations from Roman-era Britain and Northern Europe. This ancestry differs from individuals associated with the expansion of the Roman empire (i.e. those of Mediterranean origin) and instead resembles the local and/or rural communities in Germany, Poland, Belgium and the UK (Antonio et al., 2019; Scheib et al., 2024; Silva et al., 2024) during the Roman occupation.>D-statistics (f4-statistics) consistently show no evidence of recent gene-flow between BHW and sub-Saharan Africans, with highly similar results obtained when gene flow between local and/or rural Roman-era individuals from Britain and sub-Saharan Africans are also calculated (Fig. 4 & SI Fig. 7). Ad-hoc D-statistics found Roman-era British individuals share elevated levels of drift with BHW (and vice-versa) over non-British Iron Age individuals (SI Fig. 8; f4{Mbuti/Chimp, BHW; Roman-era British, European/MENA/African Roman era individuals}). Results of both unsupervised (K = 6) (SI Fig. 9) and supervised (K = 6) admixture (SI Fig. 11) modelling shows BHW to have the most similar pattern of ancestry with Iron Age northern Europeans.>>217678752Interesting.
>>217677766These BBC really are a bunch of satanic bastards
>>217677766Why do they keep doing this? Didn't they also depict some British royalty as a black woman in some show?
>>217679273They are OBSESSED with it.
>>217679273They have been involved in numerous scandalous affairs, I wouldnt be surprised if they do this for some kind of fetish
>>217679191they platformed some retard that said Lewis Carroll was a pedophile who was raping his niece o algohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_controversies#January_2015:_The_Secret_World_of_Lewis_Carroll_and_contributors
>>217679409I think there is more than one pedo scandal involving them
>>217679721Ah yes, the Savile affair. Nasty stuff, the BBC defended him and afaik they did not remove statues of his.
>>217679721>>217679767Look up Keir Starmer's connections to that case as well
>>217679273It’s called “the great replacement”
>>217680101Do not look up the ethnoreligious background of his wife, too!
>>217679721I would bet money that they are also covering for Stephen Fry and his pederasty.
Why are Brits like this?
>>2176768421/10would not bang
>>217676842shes the most beautiful woman ive ever seen
>>217676842She’s ugly so I don’t care
>>21768389110/10 in Bongland. Fit bird.
>>217676842she looks like she scores banger for manchester united
>>217678386kek
>>217676842what a dumb head shape
>>217677766was she actually african?
I tried finding discussions online about this and all I could find were people promoting her as evidence that there were blacks in Britain lmaoGet fucked you cunts
>>217689629Nope.
>bongs were getting mistaken for nogs even 1700 years agoit is fucking OVER for brits.you are NOT white.
