post secret EFL knowledge which filters the ESL
>>217681940They, they're, their.
I never understood when it's "whom". I just say "who".
>>217683209most native speakers just say who also but in formal writing one should use whom. its when the answer is an object of the sentence i think. the way i remember is that if the answer could be him/her, then you use whom.for whom the bell tolls -> it tolls for himwho tolled the bell? -> he did.
>>217683614I kinda get it now.Thank you for explaining this to me, based burgerbro.
>>217681940Uhh I could care less about EFLs
>>217683706
>>217683706truly my pleasure. XD <3
>>217681986That, ironically, filters the EFL.
>>217683209whom is for the accusative case and >>217683614 is right about the him rule of thumb
>>217681940I always see "lead" being used as past-tense instead of led by EFLs.
>>217683209Idk if you guys have the dative case or are similar to us there, but it's the Wen Wem difference if that tells ya anything
>>217681940I'm the king of ESLs and nothing filters me
>>217683209I think "whom" is the equivalent of "wem" in German which is dative. It could/should be used more often but since even the native speakers don't know how to use it they avoid it (and to not sound like a posh faggot). "Whom should I give this package to?" "To him.".
>>217681940I have no respect for the english language. I make some mistakes on purpose
