what should we do about sub 80iq countries?
they should be ruled over by the USA and Israel, as they are high IQ and white
>>217689747Educate them
>>217689775>Israelthey are 92IQ>>217689787intelligence is genetic
>>217689822Jews are the chosen people by god
>>217689747
>>217689747haha i wonder what's the methodology behind these numbers
>>217690133herehttps://openpsych.net/files/papers/Parra_2025a.pdf
>>217689747I'm Black and I scored an IQ of 134 on this https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/FSIQ/ IQ test. I don't feel particularly smart.
>>217689747Trade and invest with resource-rich nations.Keep your distance from those without.Best to leave meddling in other countries' affairs to those who enjoy it.
>>217689822Only partially
>>217690252This test inflates your score by about 5 pointsAnyway 134 isn't particularly high, that's only top 1% ish which is far from genius territory. In America alone there are more than 3 million people with that IQ
>>217689747Does their lower IQ explain why North Korea fell to communism and why the South became so much richer?
>>217690496But according to 4chan, the average Black IQ is around 88, and I hardly feel like being nearly 3 standard deviations smarter than most other Black people.
>>217690554>the average Black IQ is around 88That's true for African Americans but maybe the British one is different idk
>>217689747I don’t understand why people keep posting these stupid maps and “statistics.” I hope you fine people are just trolls, because if not, you are either dumb or deranged.Assuming I’m right, please enjoy my BUT ACTUALLY:>No single ~3 digit score can provide a comprehensive or inherently reliable measurement of intelligence. Matrixed tests like the various WAISes are quite a lot better and more informative, but still imperfect, and require a minimum of five different scores—there’s no objective way to condense the results into one two-or-three digit number.>No country anywhere in the world has ever come close to compiling enough test results nationwide to yield a defensible nationwide average. These numbers are based on bad samples at best (if they come from anywhere at all, I assume it’s from “IQ test” websites), arbitrary abstractions/extrapolations based on even less reliable metrics at worst. More likely, they’re just made up by somebody with access to Microsoft Paint who hates Africans.TLDR: These figures would be next to meaningless even if they were “real,” which they definitely aren’t.You’re welcome!
>>2176905211. North Koreans and South Koreans are the same ethnic group, they've been united throughout history for thousands of years.2. Decades ago there were communist South Koreans but they got purged by South Korean dictators. Japan has a communist party with a quarter of a million registered members. The Japanese communist actually won a majority in Japan's first election after WW2 but the American occupation government overturned that election result and expelled communists from Japan's government and education system.
>>217690646iqlet cope
>>217690521korean capital was in south koreank killed all koreans who collaborated with japanese (they tend to be higher IQ)immigration of high IQ people from NK to SKmalnourishedsame
>>217690252
>>217689822Weird how China's IQ only kicked in around the same time as the economic reform
>>217690252It probably adds on like 10 points of IQ, but if you really do have an IQ of 134 then you should leave this country immediately as we only want sub 90s here
>>217690753>nk killed all koreans who collaborated with japaneseThey both had crackdowns anon
>>217690646People who post these chart always reference Lynn who cooked up the numbers. But there is no point in bringing up counterfactuals because these retards don't care about facts they only want to push their agenda.
>>217693532And the Japanese leaving enmasse allowed the Koreas to do major and necessary land reforms that they wouldn't have been able to do if the Japanese still ruled them or the land owning Japanese settler class.
>>217693664>>217690186it has nothing to do with lynn you retarded monkey
>>217694345Emily Kirgaard isn't a researcher. He diean't even have a PhD and his Bachelor's was in linguistics. OpenPsych isn't even a real journal.
