[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


was the kingdom of saudi arabia a mistake?
>>
>>217704256
yes
>>
>>217704256
no (i don't want to lose my iqamah)
>>
>>217704463
good, it was to test you
>>
>>217704256
There was no credible alternative to a tribal king for the administration of what at the time was a desert sparsely inhabited by illiterate tribes whose only useful resource was pilgrimage financing. I don't see how the Al Rashid or any other clan claiming the region would have resulted in a substantially different state.
>>
>>217704256
yes
>>
>>217704500
yes this is what i personally believe but i was surprised by how many on the original xitter post saying otherwise
>>
>>217704256
They have cornered the femboy/twink market so yes.
>>
>>217704532
Probably low IQ westerners lamenting that there wasn't an inclusive democracy established by local intelligentsia while not understanding that anyone remotely educated to that level was living in other parts of the Ottoman state by the time of its breakup
>>
>>217704256
I have absolutely no clue about saudi arabia's history



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.