[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Download (16)_1.mp4 (3.38 MB, 576x1024)
3.38 MB
3.38 MB MP4
This is very powerful and eye opening.
>>
What are those whores doing with their faces out?
>>
>>217715286
Mashallah so true brother!
*throws a gay man off the roof of a building*
>>
According to Kant, it is wrong. You should act in a manner, that your behavior can become the law. And being gay cant become the norm
>>
>>217715382
>greatest german philosopher
>autistic virgin
>his name was cunt
You can't make this shit up XD
>>
Abdul and his two wives have helped me reconsider what the muslim-homosexual relations should be like
>>
>>217715286
i hate faggots and muslims
>>
>>217715382
>According to Kant
lol
>>
>>217715382
>And being gay cant become the norm
(Men) being bisexual could, I think that's what would be best actually
>>
>>217715286
what a gay tiktok
>>
>>217715286
total christianization of islam
>>
>>217715382
Short answer: no, that argument doesn’t work in Kantian ethics

Why
Kant’s universalization test is about logical contradiction, not biological extinction
A maxim fails if it can’t be conceived or willed as a universal law without contradiction

Your claim mixes Kant with a natural law / evolutionary argument, which is not Kant

Key points
Universalizing “some people are gay” does not imply “everyone must be gay”
Kant tests maxims like “I may do X when Y”, not demographic outcomes
Humanity wouldn’t “perish” because sexuality isn’t chosen by maxim, and reproduction can still exist via heterosexual people

What Kant actually said about sex
Kant was personally very conservative
He condemned all non-procreative sex, including masturbation and heterosexual sex outside marriage
His objection was about using persons as mere means, not species survival

Modern Kantian view
Most contemporary Kantians see consensual same-sex relationships as compatible with Kant
No coercion
No treating the other as a mere means
Rational agency respected

So
Your argument is not Kantian
It’s closer to teleology or natural law theory
Kant’s framework doesn’t condemn homosexuality on those grounds
>>
>>217715368
israeli lie based on ISIS (funded by israel btw) killing closeted collaborators (blackmailed by israel btw)
>>
>>217715286
I don't think I can trust that. Muslims will beat you up and throw acid on your face.
>>
File: IMG_1335.jpg (70 KB, 478x599)
70 KB
70 KB JPG
>>217715716
Secret TRVKE



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.