White men aged 18-65 are 2.8% of the world population
what can you do
>>217716801Far more than that.
White people were 1/4 of the world in 1914. I hate this timeline. Liberalism and communism caused this.
>>217716940No, retard. It is because Europe is one of the smallest continents and as countries get wealthier, they start having less children.You are also not white
Despite being only 2.8% of the population, they commit 50% of the genocides.
>>217717076He's white. You're not white.
>>217717076Go fuck yourself, resented mongrel. Don't talk about things that are beyond your league.
>>217717076Yes, you are factually correct. Yes, you are a MexiARYAN godYes, you are based
>>217717076even low income countries are having fewer and fewer childrenyes, even when you adjust for inflation and compare them to other countries throughout historyjesus christ, this is what reading marx does to your brain, you already made a fool of yourself in that other thread about violence in latam
>>217716801This sounds fake so I'm choosing not to believe it without digging any further
>>217717469You are mistaking me for someone else lol, i havent commented in a thread about violence in latam today. You cant just assume that every Mexican flag is the same person.>>217717469>even low income countries are having fewer and fewer children its mostly middle income countries, like Mexico , Argentina, Brazil that are having less children. Low income countries like in subsaharan africa have tons of kids and our countries had more kids when they were poorer, i also am not a communist, again, you cannot just assume that everyone who criticizes your nazi rhethoric is a commie.
>>217716801There is only 1 king in the kingdom.
>>217717314Are you seriously retarded enough to believe Europe should be as populous as Africa or Asia while having a much smaller landmass? or did you not even know that?
>>217717469also you didnt push back on the size of continents and how it relates to their populations because you know it is true
>>217716940>Liberalism and communism causedIt didn't.>White people were 1/4 of the world in 1914.Empires counted everyone in their empire so it's extremely hard to throw a solid number anywhere. A ton of it was based off speculation and projections.
>>217718044Europe represents 6.7% of the world landmass, yet that clown thinks Europe should represent 25% percent of the world's population. Dont bother addressing that guy. He is medically retarded.
>>217717314This is what happens when you deny your macaque nature
>>217717933asia has like 20 times the population density of oceania, your entire theory of things being predetermined by size available falls apart as soon as you do the most basic per capita analysisalso birthrates collapsed after the great depression when people were out of jobs and in turbo povertry, you dont know shit
>>217718097Ok but India is 2.7% of the landmass and 20% of the world population
>>217716814What percentage of the world population are Jewish men? Probably like 0.00001%
>>217718121ok? have you analyzed what share of that land is fit for human life and agriculture? (that is assuming you are right, which, it may not be the case because you did not cite anything)births per 1000 people could matter in some contexts, yes, when your landmass is a lot bigger, it doesnt. You are dumb if you think Europe can support the amount of inhabitants Africa has.
>>217718129same answer>>217718217
>>217716801lol, not my problem>t. white
>>217716940The only thing that could save white people is if the third world became rich and mass immigration ended. But that would also mean white people would become irrelevant. Quite the dilemma
>>217719909People would move more if they were rich.>that would also mean white people would become irrelevant.The entire alt-right/ most of the chud movement is whining that they don't get to power trip like some asshole cunt in the early 1900s.
>>217717076as countries get wealthier, they start having less children.Smartest chicano
>>217721289those are statistics, yonaikerson, not my opinion.
>>217721233then why did europe stop sending as many immigrants to the u.s. and other parts of the world when they became wealthier? it is true that some people move to other countries primarily because they like the culture of said country, but most of the time it is because the economic situation in their home countries is dire.
>>217721299>Retards say that people have no money so they cant have kids to maintain them>The other retard says that people are too wealthy so they cant have kids because whatever reason
>>217718097to be fair it also isn't consider how efficient countries are managing their resources like africa isn't even a 1 to 1 (for now) while asia has twice the population than it's share of land and mind you asia is probably even more dessert/ mountain than africa, btw africa's population was quite low at the start of the 20 century
>>217721376look at the graph of the fertility rate of any country that industrialized in the last 50 to 60 years, you will see a gradual decline with each year as they begin their industrialization process because they move to cities and raising kids in cities is expensive
>>217721376its also because rich countries have better sex education, whereas people in poor countries oftentimes have many unplanned pregnancies and they simply have kids every time they want to have sex
>>217721289he's right, more money means more time in education more awareness of anticonceptives and even more consumismerism + the economic and political independence of women had completely fuck their brains
>>217721289>countries get wealthier, they start having less childrenThey arent tied to the hip of each other. The common factor in many developed states over the years was that urban living and government policy made having more than 2 kids (and eventually ANY KIDS) a total setback alongside many people having extremely unrealistic expectations about raising a family.
>>217721424>>217721433>Saying this when we live in the golden incel era where there are more virgins than any other point in the history of mankind
>>217718217Europe doesn't have a giant desert in the middle of it that comprises half the continent like africa does
>>217716940Just liberalism.
