First Black Briton confirmed to actually be a KKKolonizer
>>217759072the eve of norf fc
ugly white
>>217759072>so this person whom we only have a fraction of their skeleton remaining? turns out she had white skin, light eyes and liked strawberriesevery day I lose a little more respect for science
>>217759072it makes me sick how much the "woke" crowd and poc try to gaslight everybody else into their lies
didnt this same thing happen with cheddarman
>>217759201classifying dead people by morphological features is chud science and it's what lead to the remains being thought as african
>>217759188
>>217759225From what I remember the scientists didn't actually figure out the pigmentation but just said it was black for some unexplained reason. The New Scientist article, which didn't first report it but did kick-start the wider reporting over Cheddar Man, later confirmed this themselves https://www.newscientist.com/article/2161867-ancient-dark-skinned-briton-cheddar-man-find-may-not-be-true/
>>217759072They're just trying to delegitimize British identity so they can justify mass immigration. Everyone already knew this was bullshit.
>>217759225>>217759396Chuds push their luck with this one. It was an extinct race of people with marginal affinity to modern Brits. They lacked genes which give modern Europeans light skin, so it's a fair enough assumption that they were darker.
Imagine how insecure she would feel about her nose if she was alive right now.
>>217759072this just btfos chuds race science doe because they used her bones to assume her race>>217759225no but to be fair cheddar man is not black as a modern concept it's more how all humans looked before we diverged
>>217759762>Being able to use someone's bones to prove their race owns the chuds!Are you actually retarded?
>>217759762>cheddarman be a kang he was the blackest straight out of africa negro before whitey set foot in britain >ok, maybe he was just dark skinned compared to people todaySo not black then? At this rate he’ll be like this woman when people accept that actually no he wasn’t that dark after all
>>217759072utterly shocking
>>217759805you are
>>217759805 that failed which means bone and skull structure determining race is nonsense while a lot of chuds do the whole bone structure thing for races>>217759914no it means we were all black at one point and it's retarded to say chedderman was an african
>>217759914Those ancient Europeans lacked genes which don't only make modern Europeans lighter, but are also the main reason why Arabs are lighter than Africans. None of this is speculative.While that doesn't mean they know exactly what kind of skin color they had, since there's other lesser genes involved, it's a fair enough guess that were pretty dark.If it still makes you feel bad, you can revel in the idea that your ancestors stomped their skulls for being shitskins when they immigrated to the isles.
>>217759201>WokeGo back to xitter
>>217760082were they replaced or did they just change over time?
>>217759072Well yeah, there aren't exactly the conditions conducive to evolving high melanin in the UK.
>>217760116They were mostly replaced by people identical with Sardinians who built Stonehenge and stuff, and then later came Indo-Europeans.
>>217759987They used DNA sequencing to determine her race you retard. Genetic science is so good they could determine the race of this woman that died around 300 ad. You know what else they could determine based on her DNA?.....HER SEX YOU DISGUSTING TROON :')
>>217760082Why would prehistory europeans be dark skinned, there was no sunlight now and there was no sunlight in the past, they would have evolved light skin upon arriving
>>217760205the wrong reading they got was from her bones, the DNA sequence was what said she is not black
>>217760208They weathered through the ice age in Southern Europe which is sunny enough. Light skin is more of an adaption to a diet low in vitamin D combined with low sunlight not low sunlight by itself.
>>217760191so no mixing with the invaders like anglo saxons? just straight up extermination?
>>217760208they didn't change instantly upon arrival it took a long time
>>217759712This. I fucking hate it when Chuds try to speak about archaeology and anthropology. They have no idea the amount of research that goes into this stuff so they automatically assume the researchers are as clueless as themselves
>>217760208does it make you insecure that we all came from africa?
>>217760285Light skin is more desirable on a instinctual psychological level, if there's no need for melanin then humans naturally gravitate towards light skin
>>217760290We still have western hunter gatherer DNA but it comes more from later groups of mainlanders that were a mix of western hunter gatherers and early european farmers rather than being purely from cheddarman and his kin
>Phrenology badWho would have thought? Just because it serves a "progressive" agenda instead of a bigoted one doesn't make it any less appalling.These people deserve everything bad that gets to them.
>>217759396>for some unexplained reasonwe will never know
>>217760374You came from Africa obviously, but not whites.
>>217759987We were never “all black”
>>217760374Out of Africa is an outdated theory. The oldest human fossils were found in Bulgaria and even if you don’t count those, the second oldest is in Morocco meaning people colonized Spain before Ethiopia.
>>217760498>>217760465insecure>>217760536it is not oudated or debunked in any way shape or form /pol/ sama
>>217760465>>217760536>>217760498american
>>217760726Cannibal Indian
Makes sense, blond people are usually somewhat physically deformed and not proper whites.
>>217759396>ut just said it was black for some (((unexplained reason)))
>>217759072Looks bit like the famous Norwegian footballer
>>217760558>what is divergent evolution Blacks are not genetically older than Whites .
>>217761920>i heard a buzzword on /pol/ mom! sorry anon i know reality hurts your feefees
>>217761433>>217761827
>>217760085nasffgtc
So… youre saying european niggas are whiteDamn… like das crazy
