which nordic countries do anons think are/will be the least bad, demographics wise
They all have helathy levels of immigration to ensure a growing population. I think Iceland might actually be the best off because they have a lot of immigrants per capita (who are often other Europeans) as well as somewhat high native birth rates. Finland is probably the worst off
>>217761437I don't understand this map, are those mermen in the north sea?
>>217761437Iceland.
>>217761565Light/air pollution map? Those are platforms
>>217761522i think sweden would be second worst then (they are like 10% african at least, norway would be second best because their oil fund should allow them to deal with birth rates much easier than other countriesbut my german friend, growth cannot go on forever! the earth's population will stop growing, as all populations have and will>>217761565it is a light pollution map, yellows and reds are the really bad ones
>>217761565I think it's light pollution.
>>2177614371. Iceland (best)2. Denmark3. Norway4. Sweden5. Finland (worst)
>>217761664>>217761578how do they cope with the complete lack of forests?
>>217761811Forests are super lame never got the appeal.
>>217761844what would you have instead, forest man?
>>217761811Cool terrain is better than flatlands with forests and swamps.
>>217761811Iceland has cool landscapes, mountains, geysirs, waterfalls, ocean views, volcanosFinland has pretty much nothing but the same depressing economic pine forest with standardized distance between the same exact size trees, you can drive thousands of kilometers and see nothing but the edge of the standardized pine tree plantation in totally flat land, its incredibly tiresome
>>217762549At least you have some rocky large interconnected lakes. Here it's really just swamps and forests mostly.
>>217761588doubt this maphow can there be so much in northern norway?
>>217761593>they are like 10% african at leastNowhere close by the way.>oil fund to help with birth ratesWe already have a very high rate of home ownership and some of the most generous maternity benefits in the world. People aren't having children because they quite simply just don't want to.
>>217762876>We already have a very high rate of home ownership and some of the most generous maternity benefits in the world. People aren't having children because they quite simply just don't want to.The carrot didn't work, now it's time for the stick, ban feminism, take away pensions from women who chose to have less than 2 children.
>>217762101>>217762549these are interesting perspectives forestanons, i guess ive only seen both of your countries from pictures and maps, same with most countries reallyi didnt know finland had so many tree plantations>>217762876>Nowhere close by the way.i may be wrong about sweden's population then, i am just an amerimutt, but by "help with birthrates" i moreso meant you don't need as much immigration to pay for old people care because you have a money stockpile
>>217761437dont go to sweden its full of africans and arabs and everyone lives on welfare
>>217762972>i moreso meant you don't need as much immigration to pay for old people care because you have a money stockpileWe'd still need immigration because you know, you need people to do those jobs.>>217762960Would require even more immigration to supplement the women now missing from the workforce, approximatrly 80% og Norwegian women aged 18-66 participate in the workforce.
