What's the correct answer
>>218195978shoot myself to show that I'm serious
>>218195978Seems pretty impossible long term, but I guess just killing the first one that tries to escape and then pretend to have plenty of more bullets.
It's a dumb question by Jews which explores social engineering.You tell them you have six bullets.You fire the one you have into the air as you have no need for it.You order them to stand in a circle with their arms linked. If anyone breaks free, you tell them you will execute not just the one that does but also everyone close to them.
obviously you unload the bullet and throw both the bullet and rifle randomly into the crowd.
Simple. I ask them to all stand in a perfect line, then I shoot my bullet through all 100 on them, getting the best frag ever and preventing them from escaping in the process.
Tell them that you will not hesitate to shoot them at the first chance to escape. Pretend you have many bullets.
>>218196383This incentivizes people up front or down back to make a run for it either because their position is either too risky or too safe
what do they do at blackrock again?
>>218196241Some additions to this strategy>if one of them is more incompliant than the others, execute him instead of shooting in the air>do an Alvin York-esque bluff and tell them they are surrounded by snipers positioned around the forest
>>218196241>>218196482every fin is born with genetic prisoner compliance game theory memory
>>218195978You just tell them you'll shoot the first one that tries to escape, no?
You assign each prisoner a unique number from 1-100, and tell them that if they run away you will shoot the lowest (or highest) numbered prisoner.
Worth noting, that's just one of 5-10 questions they'll be asking you.
>>218195978something like : of those who try to escape I'll always shoot the one with the lowest (or highest, doesn't matter) number
>>218196747So what's stopping guy number 99 from running if only guy 1 gets shot?
>>218197450789
>>218197450guy 1 won't go because he's certain of his death, then guy 2 won't go, then guy 3, etc
>>218196241This is a good foundation. Some minor refinements: all prisoners should be in a circle, facing away from the center, sitting with their legs crossed and their arms linked with the prisoners next to them. You must inform them that not only will anyone who attempts to get up be shot, but anyone who allows his neighbor to get up will be shot as well. The guard must stand in the center of the circle, such that the prisoners are unable to tell whether or not the guard is facing them at any given moment.
>>218196661this is the actual correct answer everyone else itt are a bunch of fucking retards
>>218196241Damn, Pekka. Okay...
>>218197469Bunch of guys escape at the same time and protect guy 1 with their body
>>218197469>then guy 2 won't gowhy? You've threatened #1 with death, therefore all the other 99 prisoners have 100% certainty of survival during the first escape attempt.
>>218196241>slide locks open and everybody knows you just popped your single bullet
>>218195978tell them that I'm CIA o algo
Tell them Blackrock told me to do it so they are aware of the fate worse than death awaiting them and their families should they try to escape the field
>>218195978This is an impossible task. Every prisoner knows that your gun does not have a 100 bullets in it which means they have a higher than 0 chance to escape and so they will.
>>218196241You got the job, congratulations
>>218195978I would send $100 billion to Israel
>>218198014would you go being #2 if you saw #1 just standing there?
>>218195978Tell them they're all hired by Blackrock and that's their office
>>218198729Maybe you're given a tommy gun
>>218199076Well yes? The escape attempt will with 100% certainty result in the death of #1, and not #2 or anyone else.
>>218199760why would #1 try to escape then, if its a certain death to him? read the task retard
>>218199674Even if you had a machine gun and unlimited ammo you still can't shoot in every direction at once and as the distance between you and a running murderer increases your chances of hitting them decreases. The chance for you to not miss a single one is not zero, which means all murderers have a non-zero probability of surviving and they will escape.In fact your smartest move in this situation would be to tell them to run because if you don't the chances of them jumping you and killing you increase by the minute.
>>218199826I think you need to read the task again. #1 has a zero chance of surviving, so he will not attempt to escape. #2 and everyone else on the other hand, have 100% chance of surviving the first escape attempt in this case (because you declared you will only kill the lowest number first), so they will attempt an escape.
You line them up single file and then fire the bullet in a straight line through their legs crippling them so they cant escape
>>218199901I think he meant the lowest number of the ones that try to escape. So for example if 1 tries to escape, even with others, he will get shot 100% of the time. He will never agree to run away at the same time with other prisoners, since he will always get shot. Then, 2 knows this, so he knows that if he runs with any others at the same time, he will be the lowest number, therefore have a 100% chance of death, and therefore will not run, and that continues down the chain for all prisoners
>>218200569yeah that
>>218195978it doesnt matter if the gun has a single bullet because all the murderers will run and even with a full mag you'd be overwhelmed
I feel like there's potential to leverage the fact they're murderers who'll murder each other
>>218195978i keep the bullet for self-defense and run away
>>218195978"i will shoot the first person to escape"?there has to be a first person that escapes for everyone else to escape but no one can be the first one because then they will die
>>218195978Simple, make them hold hands and make a ring and threaten to shoot anyone who flees, the left guy gets the bullet. Now I made the mini version of panopticon. Did I win jews?
>>218201021I was just about to post this. Is this supposed to be difficult?
>>218201069Also I could reinforce my strategy by bluffing that I have two bullets and I could shoot two guys that held hands with the escapee
>>21820110899 guys have a probability to survive if they just run altogether
In real life the murderer wouldn't want to commit a second crime and lengthen his prison sentence.
>>218195978kill em all
>>218201163That doesn't change the math. Just define communication as escape and they can't coordinate any such attempt.
>>218201249Like in Gaza?
>>218195978the solution is you don't>If any one of the murderers has a non-zero probability of survivingall of them do0.000000000000000001% is still non-zeroyou can't stop that unless you have a literal nuclear warhead that's 100% guaranteed to work (a magical item)
>>218201255It's better to make them kill each other if someone tries to escape, so my strategy is the best.
I shoot Larry Fink in the head
>>218197780Very good, it looks like some kapo in a Nazi death camp, you pass!
But why are jews asking their own ww2 story in a Blackrock interview?
>>218195978this >>218196661this is also the foundation for the jewish terrorism mindset
Out of a 100 people one is one is bound to risk it even after seeing you shoot the first guy that tried to escape. Who knows me might even attack you
>>218195978Supposedly the correct answer is number the prisoners 1-100 and tell them that whoever escapes first you'll shoot the next guy in line, which makes no fucking sense because they're murderers and have no sympathy for anyone. If anything that just guarantees they all run. My solution is to tell them the area is heavily mined and anyone who escapes will blow not only himself but all of us up
>>218195978it only says stop them from escaping, not keeping them alivetherefore I say that the last one alive gets to go free then shoot that guy after they've all finished killing each other
>>218196661this unless they bum rush you
>>218201964Technically one of them has to move first, and that one has a 100% chance of dying, therefore he will never move, therefore no one will ever move. Not realistic but neither is the puzzle o algo
>>218202427they aren't really looking for a solution anyway. they just want to see the candidate navigate the problem, try to come up with edge cases etc.they want to know if your brain can procedurally operate like that. the answer is almost always irrelevant
>>218201249Based hiring employer
>>218195978Damn, corporations really do be like thathttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMqNbgZnNLo
>>218201021>>218196747oh yeah assigning numbers should be how it's donethere could be multiple prisoners that are in the first place and in that case their chances of surviving is non-zero and they will go for itif they have different numbers and i threaten to shoot the guy with the lowest number when there are multiple people that escape first, the guy with lower number wouldn't go for it because they will be shot which works for everyone other than the highest number and highest number person can't go alone because then he will be shot
>>218201249No more brother wars.
>>218196418They wouldn't know you're going to multikill them
I'd just ask Grok and copy paste the answer without reading
>>218206222What if phones and laptops weren't allowed
>>218206974>he doesn't have Neuralink
>>218195978Don't shoot, but keep the threat of shooting over them.You're basically a fucking prison guard lol.
>>218204645>start assigning numbers to them>they all run before you're finished>start frantically looking around where the one with the lowest number is>can't find him>they all ran away and you're left with some numbers on your hand
>>218195978They want you to lie (like Jews do)If you kill one of them you become a murderer too and you're put in the field with them
You tell them the last one alive gets to leave and wait for them to kill each other, the you kill the last one
>>218209150You're already in the field with them.>>218209290That just makes it very likely they'll kill you to get the gun from you so they can get an edge over the others.
>>218200886Tell them to kill each other and the last surviver will live. The first person who tries to run from the massacre will be shot. They will all stay and kill each other because there is a non-zero change of survival, while being the first to run = 0 chance of survival. Once it's done go up to the last prisoner to survive, congratulate him, then shoot him in the head.
>>218209290You stole my idea fuck you
>>218196241i wish i was a jewish social engineer, it sounds fun
