[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1477003864317.jpg (154 KB, 960x720)
154 KB
154 KB JPG
Should my country build nuclear weapons? Answer yes or no and your reasoning.
>>
>>218226381
Of course. All nations which don't have nukes should get them, otherwise you'll get fucked
>>
>>218226381
Unless you expect a war or are a great power with global interests, it's a waste of money.
>>
>>218226435
This.
Even shitty nukes like the north koreans is enough to protect yourself forever.
>>
>>218226381
no
brazil is too unstable
>>
>>218226381
Even if you macacos somewhow get a nuke you will accidentally detonate it on yourselves
>>
>>218226435
It might be better to become a nuclear threshold state and still technically be following the NPT until you're actually under threat
>>
File: Flag_of_Iran.svg.png (26 KB, 1280x732)
26 KB
26 KB PNG
>>218226733
>become a nuclear threshold state
>>
>>218226381
She should eat something
>>
>>218226537
>>
>thinking americans will allow banana state near them to have nukes
>>
>>218226381
No, leaving nuclear weapons in the hands of a pack of wild monkeys is a very bad idea
>>
>>218227183
Yeah, she should eat my cummies
>>
>>218227489
pakis have nuclear weapons
>>
File: gbedoM6ZR0nX4dk0.webm (3.53 MB, 660x1138)
3.53 MB
3.53 MB WEBM
>>218226381
Sure dont really care if you keep making cute brown girls for the world!
>>
>>218226381
It seems to be the only thing that repels the great satan. That and and having no natural resources.
>>
>>218226381
Yes
You will be stronger with nuclear weapons
>>
>>218226381
Can you deter the US without them? lol
Can you promise to not go crazy ever?
>>
>>218226606
>>218227227
>least american deephtroeater baltmonkey
How's the greenland status
>>
>>218226381
Brazil once had an arms race with Argentina to build nuclear weapons
You both gave up on it and agreed not to do it again because the whole thing was stupid
>>
>>218226381

no.
Because it is not 100% sure they will be managed by south Brazilian people.

Just go to the beach.
>>
File: 1760133763182668.png (98 KB, 700x507)
98 KB
98 KB PNG
>>218226381
I think it would be a lot more strategic to have our intelligency sector maxxed out before telling the world we have the intention of creating nuclear weapons... because of... them...
>>
>>218226381
>>218229610
Nuclear sex with brown women



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.