whiteness is abundance and sharingnon-whiteness is scarcity and fighting tooth and nail to secure resources for yourself a non-white can never be a white liberal hippie. they can't even reach the state of abundance to develop that kind of thinking. we are unique in that and that's why whiteness must be protected at all costs. who wants to live in brown pvp scarcity mode, right? not even they want that
>>219284979trvke
>>219284979a non white could never be conservative either. even when wypipo used to be religious, they were already inventing the nuclear bomb and nuclear fission. the vast majority of third world countries still live in pre-medieval time periods.
>>219284979>The way of heaven is to take away surpluses while replenishing deficits, it emphasizes on balance. And the way of humans is exactly the opposite, it is to reduce the deficits and build up the surpluses. The two are complete opposites, and they are in conflict with each other.
Non whiteness is post-abundance.They are fertility goddesses, like the earth mother, they live in hyperabundant spaces (India, Africa, south america, fertile crescent) and worship female goddesses, because kf that they reproduce to ridiculous amounts and saturate their societies with diversity which collapses into disorder.Whiteness comes from the skyfather, which is a god of the steppes, there is plenty of space but lack of resources, so what there is must be carefully managed.So it is the life on the north, in Europe both the scarcity and the abundance meet (Europe is a Phoenician, brown, middle eastern, princess, like Ishtar, Venus, basically he earth mother-- she is impregnated by a white bull that comes from the sky… and that bull is Jupiter) and thus you have selection and multiplicationBrowness is abundance and fertilityWhiteness is more like limitation and virility
>>219285156>>219284979No whites are inherently into wife sharing and their women are naturally exogamous and promiscuous, this was very noticeable among Africans and Amerindians during colonization, with Asians is still noticeable, they are female mediated races. Their children are thought to belong to the mother race, as opposed to whites who value the paternal lineages and purity, that's why they have dominant traits, their phenotypes thrive much more when mixing with foreign men, in whites there is recessive expression, because here is a practice of endogamy, endomic/recessive traits pass more securely from the father to the children, than from the mother, because a man can pass down the same gene multiple times to multiple women. A woman does so limitedly, before expression. Founder effects.What we see now (sharing) is more of a rationalist, post WW2 subversion of whiteness. Hence why whiteness is physically going extinct. Is inherently incompatible and this contradiction is annihilating whiteness.Whiteness is sharing in the paternal sense, to impose onto others, is colonial, imperialistic, etc. in nature.Browness is more longhoused. More communitary (less individualistic at personal and community level), more feminine in nature.
>whiteness is abundance and sharingexplain Northern European dining habits then
