>the franks were a Germanic tribe from the low countries, that disseminated during the migration era across western Europe, mainly distributed across modern day Luxembourg, western Germany, Flanders, eastern and northern France, and England facilitated by their military roles in the then barbarized roman army after the collapse of the western roman empire they were recognized as a highly martial race. It's descendant polities and associated cultures disseminated across north america, Oceania, southern parts of Africa and eastern Europe on the periods between 1400 AD and the first half the 20th century.>Their dissapearence is associated with the century dating after the collapse of the Soviet union and Later instability in the United states.>A sudden surge of foreign dialects and archeological records reporting an increasing diversification o the archeological cultural record, as well as remains associated with individuals from neighbouring continents
>>219289969I think thats gothic architecture though that came around from latinized nords?
>>219289969WE WUZ FRANKS UND SCHEIBE
>>219291367Gothic architecture formed in the region between northern France, England, western Germany and the low countries so kind off
>>219291443Yea by normans aka latinized nords.
>>219291580Normans were franks + danish + Gaul + Brythonic from the breton additions Much like the rest of the populations in the areaNordified latins can be found in northern Italy
>>219291630Wrong. They were vikangs who were assimilated by latins. They fought against germanics and byzantines in support of latins. Think of some vikangs coming along in italy and starting killing polentones and terrones in favor of central italians.
>>219291673Latins didn't existed then bro the Roman empire collapsed in the year 400 where do I get your history from xD, latins are from the iron age, classical period and late antiquity. They didn't existed into the medieval period
>>219291917The race exists well after roman empire lol. Where do you think the term "latin america" comes from?
Please Greebro and Argentinianbro, go to university. Stop with this bullshit, please.
>>219292386No thanks Im a dropout from a technical college. Where do you think Im wrong though? France is mostly gallo-romans. The "roman" part assimilated the vikangs and the vikangs helped them first by buck breaking some germanic popes and HRE and then killing orthodox(byzantines) in southern italy. Well maybe Im wrong but Im not going back to school Im done with that shit.
>>219292551>Where do you think Im wrong though?You were wrong even before trying to talk about what you were talking about. It was bullshit before you even started. Even just the way you say "Roman" to express something that only exists in your mind because you skimmed through some Wikipedia articles without reading the sources... It's fucked up. Argentinian anon is wrong too, you both don't have the methodology to talk about history and apparently not even to study history.Oh okay now I remember what I was about to criticise when I first typed my post: you guys mistake history for race theory. History doesn't work like that. It just doesn't.>France is mostly gallo-romans. The "roman" part assimilated the vikangsFor example: you see how fucking retarded that sounds? Do you see it? As a matter of fact, the vikings were prone to assimilating into other populations, as shown with the Anglo-Saxons, the Balts and Slavs, and of course here in Normandy, eventually converting to christianism. Nothing to do with the "Roman part" of a supposed Gallo-Roman dichotomy (as if the Gauls and Romans were forever divided to begin with). Your mistake is you still divide Gauls and Romans ethnically, religiously, culturally (was the case during the expansion of the empire but completely irrelevant 1000 years after, and at this point only the cultural backgrounds were relevant if they even were considering religion was basically the only deciding factor in power dynamics).And anyway. I'm not a historian, I studied philosophy but had close friends in history university, and I educated myself with academic sources. This is not /his/ and it's getting nowhere.Don't trust your intuition.
>>219293355Sar its called "roman" catholicism for a reason. Like did you ever go to the chateux in your country? They are all full of statues of roman gods to this day, even in three muskaiteers books d'artangan invokes jupiter etc.Anyways this particular group of vikings assimilated to "roman" catholicism in northern france and from them came gothic architecture.
Didn't cha know Frenchie? qœqquè
>>219293604The castles in my little town are "châteaux-forts", fortified castles from the 9th to the 12th century, still with pagan symbols. You're assuming things that you have no real knowledge of because your knowledge is very superficial.But yes the topic was gothic architecture. Architecture never had anything to do with religion almost, there have always been trends that followed the new scientific developpments and aesthetic fashions, but like you I'm more familiar with the anthropology of history rather than the cultural aspects.>assimilated to "roman" catholicism"Converted" is the right word. It's a power thing, not a racial or even cultural thing. If you don't use the right words you can't form the right ideas.What was the fucking point again? There's no point to this.
>>219293823>The castles in my little town are "châteaux-forts", fortified castles from the 9th to the 12th century, still with pagan symbols.Right? Go ahead and check gardens of luxembourg or something and tell me what you see. To deny latin influence in france is stupid. Anyways this latin influence assimilated this specific group of vikangs which helped them fight off orthodox byzantines in italy and who created gothic architecture.
>>219294515Adopting someone else languge or technology as you occupy their lands have nothing to do with anything reallyAfricans settling greece these days are adopting English and European technology.Few it has to do with it.The losers are the Greeks when their lands get settled by africans, and so the Greeks are the ones to dissapear if so.
>>219291986The race went extinct somewhere in the imperial era. Closest living relatives are somewhat north italianLatins were mostly clustering somewhere between a Corsican a basque and a Lombard/piedmontese, etc.The people later got admixed with migrants from near east, giving rise to south Italians. In the north however they mixed up with Gauls and Germans, becoming north Italians.The Gaulish regions got small roman settlement, occupants resemble occitan Gauls, basques resemble basques, Bretons resemble a mixture of iron age Britons and Gauls, the eastern and northern french are similar to the Belgians (a mixture of germanics and Gauls) and the Normans were largely somewhere in between Breton and north french.
>>219291398No. We wuz, you mountain/forest ape.
