[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Africans.mp4 (3.71 MB, 360x640)
3.71 MB
3.71 MB MP4
interesting
>>
Buying ticket to Kenya
>>
He doesnt look thrilled
>>
>yes you can cuck your husband but... only with people the same generation, or you will get brutally executed
oh my god wakanda forever
>>
Polygamy is our natural state. Monogamy was an adaptation, so not really crazy.
>>
File: 1739168827213643.gif (638 KB, 200x152)
638 KB
638 KB GIF
>>219323731
>>
>>219324379
Theres nothing to support this hipothesis except fringe tribes that didnt make it out of the jungle.
>>
>>219324424
>Theres nothing to support this hipothesis
>what is sexual dimorphism
Up to 90% of mammals are polygamous. Monogamy just made sense for a civilized society, more men protecting, meant a bigger chance to survive, especially for children.
>>
>>219324379
What you actually mean is polygyny, one man breeding with multiple women
>>
>>219324379
humans are currently living in their natural state
>>
If this behaviour shocks you, chances are you are a brainlet. I find it odd myself, but this is not fetishistic or perverse in any sense. I'm not saying everything is justifiable, but the things those tribes do often make sense in their own universe.
>>
>>219323731
i bet i loves jeffre cantu-ledesma
>>
>>219324553
90% of mammals walk on all four limbs why don't you do it as well retard?
>>
>>219324638
It wasn't just one man, but a group of them, smaller than women's but polygamy nonetheless, otherwise it'd be a party for inbred features.

The key of the homo sapiens to raise above other hominids at that time was cooperation, despite being weaker and not so much smarter than others.
>>219324794
That's why I said "adaptation", mouthbreather. Just like we adapted to walk on two legs, we adapted to monogamy because it made more sense. That doesn't mean we aren't mammals and we hadn't had a starting point, our natural state.
>>
Polygamy actually makes more natural sense. Women are not happy with low-tier/mediocre husbands. Men are not happy with one wife until death.

This creates a positive incentive system. High-tier men (smarter, harder working, better at fighting, etc.) accrue multiple wives. Mid-tier men get one wife. Low-tier men get 0 wives. But you can still work your way up the ladder. Only the top 60% of men end up reproducing, rinse and repeat. This is what humans did for most of prehistory. It's not that all men got multiple wives, but the champions of any given tribe/society did, and had the most kids, and thus the species improved and the Y chromosome in particular diverged.

Once again we are regressing back to that system, with extra steps/dressings. The highest tier men simply don't settle down and fuck endless women (without commitment), or go on serial marriages/divorces to achieve the same thing by proxy. Neither of these are ideal. When they take on a wife it should be a commitment to her and their kids and it should be hard to ditch her, she's his responsibility. By denying a real, obvious, natural phenomenon we become victims to it. The worst case is black society in America.
>>
>>219323731
Actual /int/ernational culture for once. Bless you sar
>>
File: 1768332476832181.gif (2.59 MB, 498x279)
2.59 MB
2.59 MB GIF
>>219325060
>Women are not happy
>>
>>219325813
based
>>
>>219324379
>t. Degenerate
Yeah no
>>
>>219324553
>I must rape and kill because 90% of mammals do it
>I must walk around naked, live outside, and never cook my meat but it raw....
>because I am a mammal
>>
>>219325060
>Men are not happy with one wife until death.
Of course we are.

You're welcome to bang your 4 cousins though, ahmed. Whatever collapses your "society" faster.
>>
>>219324929
>brown science
Walking on two legs is natural to humans. Its not an adaptation.
>>
>no one here has actually looked up the research on the damaging effects of polygamy (really polygyny) on society as a whole and people
>>
>>219327319
Of course it breaks down bonds. How are men supposed to cooperate if they cant start a family and have to constantly fight other men for it? Society is weak and social bonds are destroyed. Another nation who worships the sky father comes and wipes them all out. That's what happened to the few matriarchal societies here were and that's what is gonna happen again.
>>
>>219327254
It was an adaptation as mammals, that was the point.
>>
>>219327547
It gets even worse:
>broken, shattered "homes"
>surplus male problem (hordes of angry incels)
>massive wealth inequality
>increased infant mortality and child malnutrition
>by the above, higher rates of stunted, idiot children
>mentally broken women then raising mentally broken children
>large amounts of civil strife and instability
>>
>>219323731
He has a phone but they live in huts? seems fake
>>
>>219327999
polygyny is for small tribes only (and tribal life is hell btw), it causes societal collapse when applied to civilizations with millions of people
>>
>>219324379
Leftist propaganda and total denial of human nature.
>>
>>219324379
dying at 50 was also the natural state of humanity. Rape is common in nature, that doesnt make it morally justifiable. Most people are capable of being faithful to their partners, it makes no sense to break the social order and risk the spread of STDs just because it supposedly appeals to a more primitive state of civilization.
>>
>>219324553
The term is polygyny. You think the harem leader lets other stallions casually mate with his females? You think the silverback gorilla lets other males mate with the females in his troop? You're fucking retarded and you got lied to by your leftist sociology prof.
>>
>>219324553
>more men protecting
Dawg i know people with several wives and i don't give a single fuck about their kids because they're just not mine. Why tf would i ever care about another man's kids?? If he dies his relatives can care for them but idgaf about them and neither does anyone else really.
>>
>>219324379
cuck
>>
File: IMG_7643.jpg (579 KB, 1170x1317)
579 KB
579 KB JPG
Masai used to be my favorite african tribe but had no idea they were cucks this whole time baka
>>
>>219324379
>our natural state?
>yeah just look at these retards who are at the bottom 0.0001% of humanity dood
>>
>>219324379
humanity was literally built on neolithic communism
all societies that tried to change this rule degenerated and perished
>>
>>219323731
Sounds like bs to me
>>
>>219330666
>total denial of human nature.
Not even possible
>>
>>219324379
yes but not cuckoldry
>>
>>219324379
Yeah polyGYNY and harems is, not sharing your waves. Evidenced by guys innately hating the notion.
>>
>>219336874
>innately hating the notion.
If true cucks wouldn't exist
>>
>>219336901
>If vision is normal how come some people are born blind?
You're retarded, literally too dumb to understand what a trend is.
>>
>>219323731
Blacks are cucks by nature. Every time you see a "made for BBC" post it's a projection, their gfs are getting shared by the entire hood.
>>
>>219337836
How stupid do you have to be to think that the majority of BBC posters are black?
>>
>>219335676
the idea that it is natural to have some kind of hippie free love polycule is completely ridiculous and doesn't occur in nature at all.
>>
>>219337912
He is a polack, you do need 3 of them to change a lightbulb after all.
>>
>>219331417
>Why tf would i ever care about another man's kids??
Jesus, no wonder Egypt is such a shithole
>>
>>219338970
It's a genuine money sink and waste of time unless you get that single mother to pop out a kid of your own
>>
>>219324379
Polygyny yes, polyandry absolutely not



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.