>trace family ancestry back to late 1700s Portugal>100% peasants
>trace family ancestry back to 1700s virginia>indentured servants and one slave
>Woaaah my ancestors from this part of the world from the 1700s were most people were farmers were farmers
>>219408098right wingers aren't particularly bright or historically literate
>>219408069>Europe is a garden>Noo my ancestors were gardeners
Posters added context: OP does not want to talk about the peasants angle; he just wants to highlight his alleged lack of recent Subsaharan and Native American blood; i. e., 'Look, guys. I'm from Brazil but not what you picture most Brazilians to look like.'
>>219408122No, my ancestors were kings, vikings, pirates, cowboys, conquistadors, injun princesses and all the other cool stuff or something
>>219408069whats your point?everyone's family traced back enough is peasents or herders. until very recently those were the only 2 kinds of people
>>219408169Your ancestors were all financiers and usurers and shit because Jews can't farm. You wouldn't get it.
>>219408155Yep lol. All my ancestors were portuguese farmers isnt that hilarious XD. Did you know my great grandmothers favourite barber had blue eyes?
>>219408229You’re unironically right about portuguese women going to the barber.
>>219408155Ohhh that makes sense. He's a pick-me pardo
They were merchants
>>219408069Mine were briefly lords in county Mayo Ireland. Rest were peasants though.
>>219408209youre just retarded judaism is a farmer religion all holidays are agricultural (early bloom,harverst,sfirat omer...)
All my ancestors were noblemen, inventors, warriors, traders and explorers
>>219408341The Jews that matter dislike agriculture, manual labor and even 'creative' trades (pottery, forging, woodworking, etc).
>trace my family back to 16th century Finland>100% peasants
>>219408393read my post again100% of your ancestors were either peasents or herders
>>219408393You can say that about literally any group on earth
>>219408449There's a saying that there's no shame in honest work. Do jews also have this saying?
>>219408069who cares, most people were not aristocrats
>>219408069
>grandpa on my dad's side was a semi-well known quantum physicist who was the director of the cornell particle accelerator>I am a midwit social retard
>trace ancestry back to 1700s>still living within 20 km of the same placeIt's a really nice forest. What else do I need?
>>219408069>trace family ancestry back to Africa>they were all kangs
>>219408996A kingdom of kings is not a kingdom doe.
>being able to trace back as far as the lat 1700sLucky you, I hit a wall in the early 1800s. They weren't special, but they sure were fucked up.
My maternal family ancestry: railroad barons from Prussia, and Dutch middle-class clerks.My paternal family ancestry: mystery farmers with no written records.
That sucks. I can trace my ancestry back to over dozen lines in Scotland that are descended from nobility and interesting people.
>trace family ancestry back to Italy and Spain>The Italian ones owned factories and we're bourgeois, many bankers among them
>>219408169Herder has more aura
>>219409615we live in a world where the farmers and settled societies essentially won and have taken over the planet.the cultural gap between herders and farmers was greater than any inter-national cultural gap today. herder and farmer societies hated each other and constantly fought there's stories of this almost everywhere in the world. some of the only places in the world where herder culture still persists are arabia and even there its dying
I'm simultaneously descended from Irish convicts & a revolution-era French PM who fled the country on a hot air balloon
>>219408122you can be disappointed by something while also understanding that it was likely. You too would also find it neet if your greatX20 grandparent was a duke of Bulgogi.
>>219408263grim
>>219408069>>trace family ancestry back to late 1700s Portugal>>100% peasantsAverage muh conquistador larper
>>219408209>Jews can't farmBruh
>>219410222he could be Azorean from Floripa
>>219408069If you have "de", "da"., "do", "dos" in your surname (like Da Silva) your ancestors were most likely slaves or property belonging to that respective rich family.Lots of people from former colonies have those prepositions on their surnames.
>>219408449Let me guess, youre a banker?
>>219410354Every single Brazilian has slave ancestry
>>219408069My great grandma was nobility
>>219410447das rite
>>219410385no where did i say anything about banking
>>219408069>Trace family back to ancient egypt>100% jews
>>219410249Okay they can farm goycattle but that's it.
>>219408069i find it funny how every american claim to descend from nobility
My 5xgreat grandfather is a semi well-known explorer
>>219410354what if my name is Petroswickonicovick Wandeckerkof Silva Santos, were my ancestors slaves?
>>219408069>peasantsoh wow who would've known
>>219408155yup, classic brazilian thread
>>219408069Almost every descends from purely the lower classes so I wouldn't be crying over it.
>>219408069Yeah yeah "portuguese"More like, run away slaves that took their masters surname
Not everybody can trace their ancestry to a barony and county like me. Don't worry about it. (((merchants))) killed feudalism so titles don't really matter anymore.
>>219408341I once attended a uni lecture with an Ashkenazi professor who said that Jews weren't allowed to own land and that's why they all lived in the cities
>>219410622we don't
>>219410826on 4chan at least you do
>>219410893I've never seen that. If we were royalty in Europe why would have moved to America?
>>219410893Reread the first post in this thread. First American is literally saying he descends from slaves and indentured servants.
>>219410808false we can own land and i can literally see farms from my window
>>219410796The slaves are still like 30-40% portuguese on average anyway.
>>219410385Mizhahi subhumans are not smart enough for intelectual tasks
>>219410931>>219410936cope
>>219408069test
>>219410354>>219410385POORTUGUESE UNIRONICALLY THINKING THERE HWITELMAO LOL PURLO LULZ KKKKKKKKKK
>>219408069>entire family history is farmers>absolute bottom class but also the most important land owners so people had to respect them>land owners had a thing or two to say in politics back then, infact they where so important that some became prime ministergod i miss thoose days.
>>219408069It's good to be of humble stock, aristocunts are dreadful people
>>219408069>be me >white, all family is white>grandfather was a holocaust survivor
>>219410458>t. Descendant of the proud von Pöopensteinberg family
>>219410622It’s very common for anyone actually. As long as there are good records to let you trace a good chunk of your family back to the 1600s, you’re very likely to find nobility—at least if you’re of British desdent. Americans have a leg up because genealogy has been an obsession here for a long time. There are well established genealogical societies relating to colonial settlors in the 1600s, the exact timeframe where you’re likely to find a dozen or so noble ancestors for the average person. The work is already done for you if you can follow your family’s paper trail through the 1800s and 1700s. Look up Douglas Richardson’s work for a good example, or the New England Historic Genealogical Society.
>>219408069So you come from hard working productive people rather than inbred parasites, how's that bad
>>219411669not it's not, i can trace my family to 13 century on my father's sidezero nobility
>>219408069My family is full of jews. One of them was vice president of a pre-WW2 factory in the city I live in and a few were secret police during the commie days.
>>219411880I don’t know much about non-British nobility, so I can’t say anything for France. It’s why I added that caveat. I think Britain may be a little different due to the much smaller population there for most of history before hitting a latter population boom. British genealogy also has ample genealogical sources, like Burke’s peerage and visitations, and good records (idk what France has). Even in Britain, I think it’s easier and more likely in Scotland over England for similar reasons.As for your research, I find it very hard to believe you didn’t find anyone after exhausting every branch on your paternal side. It would be statistically unlikely. If you’re talking about just your direct paternal line, that is only a small fraction of all your ancestors. And it sounds like you haven’t been able to investigate your maternal side very far. For me, my maternal side only has one gateway ancestor while my paternal side had over a dozen proven or plausible gateway ancestors (my paternal side happens to be entirely British though).
Funny enough that just by having a flushing toilet, a warm heater in the cold and an air conditioner in the heat, and a cell phone w/ internet access you are RICHER THAN KINGS AND QUEENS from any time before the 20th century
>>219408094>trace family ancestry back to 1600s virginia>all english nobility and wealthy plantation ownersI think my 8x great grandfather owned your 8x great grandfather
>>219408069Farming is based and redpilled, i want to have a farm with chickens and cows and pigs. Foking hate the city
>>219408069this is sad bro at least you could have a weeeeeeeeeeee little impoverished fidalgo in there or something
>>219408069>trace family ancestry back to late 700s Norway>100% nobles
>>219412376>to late 700sHow? What kind of records?
>trace my ancestry back to the 500s AD>we wuz kangz n shiet
