How do white people cope with their mother and sisters and daughters dressing like whores in public?This degeneracy is hurting my country too now
Bbc sex goddess
>>219421677___
>This degeneracy is hurting my country too nowYour traditional temples are full of naked women engaging in lustful orgies. Traditionally Indian women walked around with their bare chests exposed.You are not an actual Hindu. You are an abrahamite who larps with the superficial cover of your now extinct indigenous religion who has been pozzed beyond belief (no pun intended) by Muslim conquests and Victorian colonization into adopting abrahamite puritanism.
>>219421677You just knew
>>219421677Because we are too weak willed to control anything, including ourselves.
>>219421790shattered his clit
>>219421790>>219421884>art is the same as real life>greek statues are naked so greeks must have walked around butt naked>you are cucked if change with times and don't follow the traditions of thousands of years agoHinduism keeps changing, dalits
>>219421954>you are cucked if change with times and don't follow the traditions of thousands of years ago Hinduism keeps changing, dalitsYou are literally a Muslim larping as a hindu, do you know that?
>>219422000tell me more about Hinduism, Mehmet
>>219422025>tell me more about Hinduism, MehmetWell for starters 90% of the shit you are believing in right now has nothing to do with hindu theology but comes from Islam and Victorian Christianity, including puritanism.
>>219422082>[vague statement]
>>219422094What's vague about this statement? This is a general statement followed by a concrete single example.
>>219421677Dressing like this did not originate with white women. They got it from India in the 60s when it was trendy to go to India and they saw Indian women dressing like whores there and started copying them.
>>219422151>thread has nothing to do with religion>but religion>nude art means everyon's a nudist>if you change with time you're a muslimeek ook monkeyI don't give a shit about religionEven if I did why does it matter what women did thousands of years ago?Do you personally live your life like how your cucked ancestors did thousand years ago?If yes close the tab and go offline immediately
>>219422025Bro he is right, you are literally retarded.In tamil and malayali region at least, women only wore loin cloth for the bottom plus some jewellery like necklace thats it Corroborated on almost all acounts from marco polo visiting tamil Pandya kingdom to the dutch guy visiting malabar princessPuritanism started with
>>219422217>my ancestors walked around naked and shit in the woods why should I not be allowed to do the same
>>219422216>thread has nothing to do with religionUh, yeah. The reason why Indian women dress today has absolutely to do with religion. Are you retarded?This is actually very shocking to me. Are the average Indians this uninformed about their own country's culture and history? Holy fuck.
>>219421677she wants to give her boys the Oedipus complex, it has been discussed in Western philosophy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_clothing_in_the_Indian_subcontinent>India was one of the first places where cotton was cultivated and used even as early as 2500 BCE during the Harappan era. >saar Indians walked around naked saar>you only wear clothes because of religious puritanism>people were happy being butt naked in winter
>>219422351From the same article. This is literally how Indian women used to walk around before you got conquered by Muslims.
>>219422351Retard, southern india was scorching hot with no ac or fan Not even the Malabar queen covered her breastsWhat do you think peasants did?
>>219421790bodied the nu-dindu bitch
>be OP>talk some dumb shit>immediately get destroyed >OP starts backpedaling while bawling his eyes out*sips* Ahhhh.... now THAT'S the kind of 4chan thread I'm nostalgic for.
>>219422425>muh dravidian abosno one cares>>219422422that's not supposed to be a human, you fucking retard
>>219422435
>Aiiie is that a woman wearing clothes?
>>219422456>muh dravidian abosUnless you are notheast chink, you also have at least 30% AASI whichever caste you belong to Carry on great aryan sir. Show hans johann wolfsburg how little you know about the country and its history
>>219422560once again history means shit, aboyour people used to sacrifice humans. Should we bring that back?It doesn't matter what people did back thenthe only thing that matters is what they're doing now
>>219422496Imagine unironically following a twisted 'version' of a religion that only superficially resembles the indigenous creed from your territory that has been utterly altered by your colonial occupiers, especially western ones that you go around and accuse others of collaborators. LMAOHindutva is the modern-day equivalent of ISIS to Islam and Evangelical Christianity, a cringe larp and tool of control of foreign western influence over non-Western religious groups.
Fuck, can you just imagine that? Can you IMAGINE what arabs saw?Imagine coming from a place where all women are covered as if they are top secret archives, then you get into india just to find goddesses with their overflowing tits out, begging to be inseminated... nnnnngggggggggg
>>219422588>the only thing that matters is what they're doing nowCool, so stop justifying your shitty politics with a nostalgic faux-past that has never existed.
>>219422496>SAAR YUU MUST AGREE WITH ME UNCONDITIONALLY OR YUU ARR HECCKIN RAYCIS SEPOY!kek cry more, bitchdon't make shitty threads trying to pretend you know everything, just to get btfo in less than 5 posts>>219422560>>219422599you're replying to a nu-dindu gobar bhaktthey've decided to ape muzzies after getting thoroughly defeated in the cultural war
>>219422599are you really braindead?I've already said I don't follow hinduism or give two shit about religionIn any case which religion do you follow? Is it nudism?
im not a third world cretin so i dont care
>>219422664so if you don't give a shit about any religion, why do you have your panties in a twist over liberal values?only religiontards preach that women should cover themselves up because seeing a woman show a little bit of her skin is sinful and arouses themthe more liberal and less religious a place becomes, the more freedom women have to just wear whatever they want
>>219421677If everyone dressed like a whore then there wouldn't be any whores. People would become desensitized to nudity and nobody would care. Ironically, the more of a woman's body you hide the more rapey the society is. Look at African tribes. Too much clothing is unnatural and ruins male brains.
>>219422659>my chamar grandmother dressed like a whore and paid breast tax so it was the norm>>219422745>if you are not religious you must be a degenratepost nude pics of your mother, liberal bro
>>219422775>Your moral system is abrahamite.because your headcanon says so? What religion are you? Why are you afraid to say it?
holy shit this dindu dude got BTFO ITTI've never seen anything quite like it!
>>219422816t.
>>219421954> greek statues are naked so greeks must have walked around butt nakedwe have a lot of evidence that they did
>>219421790Based Hans
>>219421790>let me tell you about your countryyou're an American mutt
>>219423008You are a three way mongrel AASI + ZAGROS + ARYAN just like everyone elseYou dont have licence to call anyone mutt
>>219423073>Must. Defend. Massa.
>I don't care about religion>muh degeneracy holy brainlet, do you have even two neurons to rub together?
>>219423123>you have to be book thumping religious retard to oppose degeneracy
>>219423099>Must. Ape. MuzzieMassa.
>>219423150>only muslims hate whoreslmao
>>219423142hey genius, women wearing the clothes in your op webm isn't "degeneracy", unless you're a muzzie ofcourse>>219423168>woman wears slightly revealing clothing>she is immediately a whoreyes, keep aping your muzziemassa's mentality, nu-dindu gobar bhakt
>>219423211you're awfully defensivedoes your mother dress in the same way?
>>219423211Chamar bro I...
>>219423211You type like an unironic butthurt self-hating dalit on twitter embarrassing
sea women wear their revealing cultural clothing for cosplaysthey don't see it as "degenerate"chinese women wear their revealing cultural clothing for cosplaysthey don't see it as "degenerate"even indian women continue to wear traditional indian clothing throughout their daily lives, revealing their waists and back, and it's still not "degenerate">>219423236women wear sari everywhere in indiathey're all whores, right gobar bhakt?>>219423238gobarmin xister, it's time for you to start praying to shitallah and transition to tranislam
>>219423316So your mother does dress like this thentopkek
>>219423316why so defensive?
>>219423358dress like what?>>219423361why so muzzie?
>>219423374why are you islamophobic?Jai bhim jai meem bro
>>219423374A whore
>>219423389agree, gay shit ram mia>>219423391your mother is a whore? nice
>>219423410Already said don't give a shit about religion, do you need some reservation to understand that?
>>219423410>your mother is a whore? nice
>German ran off after being exposed as a lying retard
>>219423437do you need bhiksha or jizya? make up your mind already>>219423442nice selfieis that how you reacted after seeing your mother?
>>219421677It's high time south asia embraced secularism
>unironic chintu newfag with filenameslmao
>>219423142Degeneracy from what? What starting point are those clothes degenerating from?
>>219423579clothes from just 20 years ago matewomen didn't dress like this in publicBut I don't think onlyfans race (whites) will understand
>>219421677Equivalent exchange, because they all dress like that it means that all foids you find also dress like.
>>219423652>first euro flag that's not coping and gives an answerfair enough spainbro
When is south asia going to treat women as full human beings with agency? Women don’t care about some incel’s opinion on what they wear
>>219423669r/tumblr is that way
>>219421677>degeneracy>now
>>219421790>Your traditional temples are full of naked women engaging in lustful orgies.No it wasn't. Most of those arts were meant to depict them as vices. The same temple that people love to post also contains images of people having sex with animals and other degenerate acts. >Traditionally Indian women walked around with their bare chests exposed.Once again no, maybe they did in southern states but there's art showing common women wearing choli from ancient times. >adopting abrahamite puritanismPlease stop getting history from librandu sources sir.
>>219423716
>>219423716that's Indian degeneracy, OP webm is western degeneracymy question was about western degeneracycan you tell two apart? or do you fags only know whataboutism?
>>219423666I get to see topless women at the beach every summer, this kills the puritan.
>>219421790>>219423730And here's exactly the kind of retardation I was talking about >>219423716That sculpture is that of a yakshi(Basically a man eating demoness) and if you know anything about Hinduism, they're not ever depicted nicely.
>>219423316>sea women wear their revealing cultural clothing for cosplays>they don't see it as "degenerate">chinese women wear their revealing cultural clothing for cosplays>they don't see it as "degenerate"Lol wut? They were seething and crying in twatter when beyonce or some other pop musician randi turned their qipao or whatever traditional dress to fetish wear. If you're talking about particular cosplay randis, they do see it as serving particular degenerate coomercels.
>>219423741>>219423790This is art in a temple in my country that was built by people from India. The Goddess Parvati is topless here. There are other topless godesses there too. I went there as a kid and was shocked by it because I did not know about Hinduisms history. I was really small. Probably the first depiction of boobs I had seen.
>>219424021The temple
>>219424021>>219424037>built by abo dravidians
>>219422772Fair enough I guess. But then the opposite becomes the sexualized and cause of simpery. I'll point to you Kerala history, where women did walk around bare chested(Which usually gets confused to be common all across India) where traditional art is prostitutes and apsaras depicted them as dresses extravagantly.
>>219424021>>219424037>made in 1926>reconstructed again in 1986Bruh
>>219421801You know the left kid is getting a piece now and then
>>219424073>traditional art is prostitutes and apsaras depicted them as dresses extravagantly.traditional art of prostitutes and apsaras depicted them as dressed extravagantly
>>219424061>>219424130So you're saying Indian degeneracy started in the 80s or even 20s? You're caping so hard for values beaten into you by Muslim invaders. Slave mentality lmao
>>219424274you truly are smooth brainedkeep posting randis as /bharat/ OP instead
>>219422772>Ironically, the more of a woman's body you hide the more rapey the society is. Look at African tribes. Too much clothing is unnatural and ruins male brains.Not to argue against my own points made in other comments here but Africa is literally the rapiest place in the world
>>219422772>>219424304>Africa - where certain tribes have women with tits out - has too much clothing
>>219424274>So you're saying Indian degeneracy started in the 80s or even 20s?I said none of it.When talking about ancient Hindu art depiction of common life, you're bringing up some paintings made about ethereal beings from the 80s. >You're caping so hard for values beaten into you by Muslim invadersOnce again stop getting history from memes. Ibn battuta visited Kerala and I talked about women of kerala >>219424073 here. This is the map of Kerala.
>>219424274>>219424364Also Kerala is unique in that it had a matriarchal society which was not found common elsewhere in India(Except maybe some tribes).
is that ai
>>219421954 where do you think mordern sex positions that you jack off to in porn originated from from
>>219427955holy shit you people are retarded
https://www.scribd.com/document/541109170/The-Complete-Illustrated-Kama-Sutraeverything in this is atleast 500 year old
>Tummy>WHORE!!!!!!!!Pretty sure Indian women have long had bare midriffs though? Pretty sure you invented that.
Why is my flag so knowledgeable about india
>>219421677This civilisation will either burn to the ground or ascend to the stars. Either way, it will teach the survivors.
>>219424193look at how right presses his belly against her side. And he does that soyjak :OOO less than a fingers distance from her mouth lolThey're both definitely getting some. Absolutely no doubt. But who are we to judge other cultures?
>>219428134I believe we have the answer already
>>219428103He isn't tho, he mostly have superficial meme tier understanding. He's most likely a jeet though.
India is the only known Indo-European civilization that was never conquered by Abrahamic religion, generally/traditionally was much much more sexuality open than anywhere in the west post-Christianization/Islamification
>>219421790Flushed that curry down
>>219421677grinding that izzat, i see
>>219428174I could be coping and seething, but I think we have a few more years. I'm going to a nonwhite country like America
>>219421677most degenerate shit ive seen
>>219428239>was much much more sexuality openNo it wasn't. Ram abandoned his wife because there's controversy among the population that she might have been impure because he lived with another man for a few days. India like every patriarchal cultures had pretty conservative sexual norms for women.
>>219428239>>219428447Also while I previously discussed about Kerala, neither was Kerala that sexually 'open' either. It was conservative in other ways, the novel Indulekha(Written in 19th or 20th century) is about an educated nair woman abandoning her 'conservative' society's expectation to sleep with other men and choosing monogamy like an educated woman lmao. Well that's an oversimplication but the point was Sambandham(Kerala practice of a malayali woman having multiple partners during her life) bad. Honestly many in this thread are just conflating Kerala history with Indian history.
>>219428447I just said moreso than anywhere in the West (as in Christian/Muslim lands). Lots of historical Indian culture and fashion is just way more sexual and downright horny, much smaller penalties for LGBT tooIt gives a peek into how European or West Asian culture/religion may have developed if it was never Christianized/Islamified.
>>219428604True, just like Europe isn't all one culture, India isn't all one culture either. Simple narratives spread easier than the much more complicated, complex, and contradictory whole.
>>219428697>historical Indian culture and fashionWhat particular do you think was horny. Pic related was iirc the most common way of saree draping in India before British. If anything, today's is more horny. >much smaller penalties for LGBT tooThat might be true but that doesn't mean they were fully accepted. Most of them were ostracized by mainstream society. They still formed their own communities, their own gods and sheit and nobody cared because Indian society itself was union of many different communities or jati samprdayas.Hijdas were mostly seen as social pariah before the western promotion of trannies.
>>219428873Btw did you know, the so called bhangali saree was created because a high caste bhangali wahmen was debited entry to elite British club when she tried to enter it dressed like that old lady statue as they didn't allow women who showed off their arms kek. So she just put on a shirt and draped the saree like she usually did.
>>219428873>Pic related was iirc the most common way of saree draping in India before British. If anything, today's is more horny.See, and that is more revealing than anywhere in the West until the 20th century (and the sexual revolution), she has completely bare shoulders and its even off one shoulder, fitted to the curves, even to this day you would be considered inappropriately dressed if you tried to wear that to work or school. Compare a European peasant in her traditional garbWhen I think of clothes I think of the bare midriffs sometimes seen in paintings like >>219428099 , bare shoulders/arms, etc. And I think of the Indian naked sculptures that show women with very round ass/breasts fucking and sucking, they are the only historical artworks that look like it could be made by a modern day porn addict, I can't even link them here because its a blue boardhttps://www.indica.today/long-reads/erotic-sentiment-in-indian-temple-sculptures/>That might be true but that doesn't mean they were fully accepted. Yeah like I said, just moreso than the West. To this day some Christian/Muslim nations will just kill you for being LGBT, vs in "pagan" Asian countries (India, Japan etc) its seen as more weird rather than as evil.
>>219421677She's beautiful, like really beautiful
>>219421790Bodied the fake-jeet.
>>219421677>>219423716wtf, how do I get pajeeta gf in my country, saar migrate here with your mom and sister now
>>219429265>it must be true because white massa said it
>>219429104I didn't know that but it makes sense! Bare arms weren't accepted in womens fashion, let alone formal fashion, til the 20th century (and bare shoulders to this day will get you kicked out of church or school)
