no such thing as a femcel.
Hmmm I wonder why…
>>219506630I've heard speed dating is a waste of time
>>219507841Femcels exist, they just have a triple digit body count.
That place looks like a nightmare, yeah they're fine looking fuckdolls but I don't even know what I'd talk about with women like that. Or most likely I'd just meant to be listening to to them talk about something, then they'd be like damn you're such a good listener (if you fill their list of requirements, otherwise you'd be a creep) and then maybe you get sex at the end but that seems like a very boring night
>>219506630yes. men are all literal animals here. not a single man worth dating.
>>219506630>posted it again award
I recently gave up and started dating a 5/10 girl and I highly recommend it
>>219506630There are no woman incels you dumb fuck
>>219507965I would never run out of things to say, my favorite topics are mars colonization and advanced robotics.Success guaranteed.
>>219506630That never happened and you know it. Its just clickbait. Litteraly any social event is a sausage fest
sounds like pure bullshit
>>219507885>believing /pol/nigger LARPingI miss when this site had "the works here are fiction and falsehood. Only a fool who believe anything posted here as fact."
>>219509234>>219509301You can easily look up that dating events are failing because of the lack of men attending.
>>219509454why dont you do it for me
>>219509301Idk man, it reflects the shit I see near campus bars these days in my hometown.Used to be a pretty even split, after covid it's always well over 70% women.
>>219509454It doesnt. Any non clickbait video younfind about dating event shows theres a lot more men than women.Had a similar experience when i attended one. There was about 20 men and a couple of women.
>>219509349>I miss when this site had "the works here are fiction and falsehood. Only a fool who believe anything posted here as fact."It does. It's still on /b/. It was never a sitewide notice.
I think a lot of women are lonely and aren't being asked out as much as they'd like to. People just see the exception and think it's the norm.
>>219506630It used to be the other way around: paid for men, free for women. This they call progress?
>>219509633They are, theyre just mad the people they see around them arent supermodels, that all.
>>219506630>nytimes>no articleKek people really just believe any random tweet these days.
>>219509633Hard for a bunch of dudes on 4chan to actually see what's happening outside of their own narrow view anon. Even harder for people these days to entertain ideas that run contrary their worldview.
>>219509633Lol lmao even. Maybe they could try ask someone out for once?
>>219509867>randomeven myron gaines retweeted ithttps://x.com/MyronGainesX/status/2025967595946430572
>>219510312I don't know who that is, and it doesn't change the fact there is NO source provided even though they say it's from NY Times lol. I tried looking yesterday too and I cannot find an article about it.
>>219506630how the fuck are you expected to go on a date with this woman and not glance at these every few seconds when talking to her?
>>219512497You are looking at AI image you stupid jeet
>>219512552are you sure?
It looks like a Grok generated image too
>>219512572Look at how none of the women at the front are even looking at each other, it happens with Grok and you have to insist on what each person is looking at
>>219512683>>219512552well, I'm dumb for noticing
>>219512497Ignoring the fact this is AI. Who said you are expected not to glance at the goods?
>>219507965my jeet radar is beeping
