Are there people with Homo Erectus genes in your country? For us, it's certainly less than .5% of the population.https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.03.709416v1.full
>>219813646
>>219813646Yes, In my neighbourhood in Malmö there are people of whomst seem to belong to some kind of Papuan Proto-Hominid subspecies who are in a turfwar with the rivaling Somalians, there is what they call a twerkoff battle between the males to decide who is the Kangs of the hood. I mostly stay out of it.
>>219813757>mostly
>>219813752
>>219813773I try my best, but circumnavigating these murky waters is easier said than done.
>>219813777Another ancient homo sapien lineage we haven't found. that's it lol.
>>219813777Picked up indirectly from Denisovans.
>>219813646Modern h.sapien are from h.erectus dumbass
>>219813646somebody give me a qrd on homo erectus and neanderthals and haplo groups and who evolved into white people and dark people
>>219815801minimal meme admix in different groups (eurasians have neanderthal africans don't (simplifying)). all humans descend from the same group of people
>>219815622Homo Sapiens and Homo Erectus have existed simultaneously for a bit. That doesn't change anything.
>>219816202W. Africans and Oceanians are like, 7% "non-human". I wouldn't call that meme admixture...
>>219815801Homo Erectus is a common ancestor for Sapiens, Neanderthals, Denisovans, and "Ghost". Homo Sapiens (or at least all humans living today. We know people lived outside Africa prior to the OOA migration) originated in africa and spread elsewhere, breeding with other homonids who helped them survive in their new environments. Neanderthals gave Eurasians genes related to both dark and light skin + hair, so these groups probably had their own races too.
>>219816251where's the 7 from?>We identified an average of 0.73% Neanderthal, 0.66% Denisovan and 0.33% ghost ancestry in Oceanian individuals.
>>219816406>>219816483"ghost" meaning an unidentified group/species?
>>219816483The admixture numbers are deff off in this study, I believe it's even mentioned. Other studies say Oceanians are around 5% Denisovan and 2% Neanderthal. I got the 7% for W. Afr from the original study that confirmed the ghost species' existence (people were suspecting it existed for a while).
>>219816635Their actual measurement for ghost admixture in west africans was higher (like 10%), but something about their methodology made them think it was lower. BRB, I'll reread it.
>>219816583Yeah. There's now an african "ghost-archaic" and "ghost-modern" distinction due to people really liking that word.
>>219816583yea. here's a simple graph
>>219816685So if I'm understanding this right, they found that a significant portion of what they thought was from ghost-archaic actually wasn't.
>>219816775Source?
