[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: sandiego1.jpg (239 KB, 1451x862)
239 KB
239 KB JPG
And now I realize that there is hope for American cities. I have no idea why Los Angeles is so bad, when clearly you can build a good Southern Californian city that has walkability, public transit, and drivability with good architecture and amenities. Apparently, it was the only major US city that was Republican run until recently, so maybe that has something to do with it, but it can't be the whole picture because most Republican cities suck, though I guess a Californian Republican is very different from a Southern or Flyover Republican. SD has a good university too, I'm thinking of doing my Masters there now.
>>
File: sandiego2.jpg (233 KB, 1345x857)
233 KB
233 KB JPG
The Gaslamp was fun on Saturday night
>>
>>220020715
>Republican cities suck
What are these "Republican cities"?
>>
>>220020715
San Diego is a decent place to visit but an awful place to live
>>
>>220020715
San Diego is the best major city in America which is funny because it's right next to Tijuana which literally ejects its poop onto San Diego beaches
>>
>>220020923
Anything in the South or Appalachia or Midwest. Name a single city that is good there. Miami is the closest to a decent city in a red state, and 90% of it still sucks.
>>220020985
Why is living there bad? Expensive?
>>
>>220020715
Los Angeles is fucking awesome if you're not low T and extremely broke
>>
>>220020923
A lot of the worst cities in the United States are in chud states. Memphis and St. Louis for example.
>but the dems run the city!
Chud state. Chud leadership. Shit cities.
>>
>>220021015
I was surprised at how White San Diego was (for a Californian city) given it is right next to the border, but maybe that makes them take illegal immigration more seriously idk
>>
>>220021022
>Anything in the South or Appalachia or Midwest.
Yeah those Republican cities like Atlanta and Chicago.
>>
>>220021027
It's ugly and dirty and has terrible public transit and has never-ending traffic and is 80% non-White. I live there bro it's not good stop coping.
>>
>>220021042
Atlanta is in a red state, and the State government is where the funding comes from and where the ultimate decision on zoning laws come from. Chicago is pretty good if you don't live in the South where black people were redlined into. Please name a single good city in a red state please.
>>
>>220021027
Only the neighborhoods near the beaches are any good. Living in the interior or any of the valleys is like living in hell. It would be better if the public transit was worth a damn so you could go to the beaches
>>
>>220021155
This. Santa Monica is nice. Venice is alright. Then the rich areas like Westwood and Beverly Hills etc are nice, but that is like 10-15% of the city, the rest is awful.
>>
>>220021034
I agree, but Democrats can't run cities well obviously. I think you want Democrats at the State and Federal level, and Republicans at the city level. Or rather you want a Blue State tier Republican running things. Republican policies in California are VERY different from mainstream Republican policies.
>>
>>220021194
I'm from the Bay Area and we're lucky because we have the bay breaking up our cities so I can drive ten minutes to the beach or bike in 20 and my town isn't even considered a beach town. But when I stayed in Los Angeles and wanted to go to the beach from the griffith observatory I had to sit in traffic for 4 hours, it's really a mess
>>
>>220021256
Yup. Even with a car you are sort of isolated into your area in LA because the traffic is UNBELIEABLY bad. San Francisco would also be top tier if it was cleaned up, it has all the right features (density, location, architecture), but it was dirty, and the homelessness, schizo, and junkie problem is serious and needs to stop being tolerated.
>>
>>220021062
Houston is worse in every single one of those categories (except white population, we have less white people so it's better) and yet I am thriving. Visiting LA mogged Houston so hard it was unreal.
>>220021155
Now imagine LA without the beaches and the entire city is instead built on sinking swamp that gets hit with hurricanes once every 2 years and a catastrophic flood every couple months.
>>
>>220021034
Those are shit cities because they're run by niggers thoughbeit
>>
>control f for “nigg”
>0 results
>mfw
I don’t know how you retard burger mutts can have this muh red muh blue conversation when the colour causing the problem is black.
>>
>>220020715
Yeah it's nice
But also costs an arm & leg to live there no?
>>
>>220020751
>Gaslamp
Normalfag
>>
>>220021027
>Los Angeles is fucking awesome if you're not low T and extremely broke
Its true. But I actually had a good time at moments.
>>
>>220021754
SF is not very black and still a mess. Niggers always cause a place to be a shithole, but they are not the only cause.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.