If you think you know the concept of suffering, you don't.There's a law that was just passed in Brazil recently that criminalizes misoginy with a sentence of up to 5 years for offenders responsible for breaking this law.In one of its clauses, it even says that participating in a diffusion of information that, despite being true, can be associated to stereotypes that disqualify the female gender, should also fall under this law.All brazilians right now are fearing for their asses internet or not for facing real jail-time for hurting the feelings of women.We are heading into becoming the first reverse Sharia country in the world, where being a man is not just metaphorically being a second-class citizen, but literally, with laws and stuff.It is especially bad because not only is the country a poor shithole with no hope of being rich, it is also a WOKE poor shithole.
Also here's the clause if anyone is interested
>>220251272>In one of its clauses, it even says that participating in a diffusion of information that, despite being true, can be associated to stereotypes that disqualify the female gender, should also fall under this law.What would be an example of that?Like, if I share a news article where a woman caused a traffic accident, could someone say "Hey, that might be true, but you're pushing for the stereotype that women are bad drivers!"?
>>220251272uhmmm uuhhhyou voted for thisa algo
>>220251369Yes, even if someone states a TRUE fact, but one that could be misinterpreted, they could be arrested.For example: "Woman in Florida loses control of her car and crashes into a wall.">women don't know how to drive>therefore, it reinforces stereotypes>arrestedAlso, if you tell an out-of-control woman that she's out of control, you'll go to jail under the law of misogyny.If you ignore an out-of-control woman, you can go to jail because there's already jurisprudence for that.All it takes is for someone who antagonizes you to put an out-of-control female in your path and you're screwed.I've read that Korea have similar laws to that, so the way to go is to use positive language with a pejorative intent, just like Koreans do in online games. When a beautiful woman does something beautiful, just say "wow, it's the first time I've seen this happen to a woman.">woman crashes car>wow, it's quite rare to see a woman crashing a car>woman messes up>wow, it's the first time I've seen a woman make a mistake like that>woman marries dark triad type and dies stabbed in a domestic dispute>wow, it's a shame that character isn't written on your face
>>220251495Fucking grim.
>>220251272Good. More Brazilians in jail without internet access.
>>220251328Stupid ape, nobody can read that shit and nobody's gonna type all that into a translatorFucking moron
>>220251272Why is Brazil like this?
>>220252511Or atleast put it through the image translator. But tbf he already summarized it in the OP.
>>220251272Can you just not be misogynistic? Like I’ve never once in my life been worried about these laws because I’m not a hateful chud
>>220251369Saying that women are geneticaly predisposed to be phisically weaker than men for exemple, which is scientifically true.
Literaly a meaningless law, women will keep getting unnalived.The same leftist scumbags that came up with this shit voted against larger sentences for rapists and women murderers. Clown show, but women support this crap so fuck them too
>>220251272>implying they'll be able to enforce it at allIf you are not popular or don't do anything crazy, chances are nothing will happen. This is just vote buying shit near election. And the more bullshit laws like this they push, the stronger the already strong argument for a new consitution gets.
>>220251272Why are spanish speaking cunts all ruled by crazy feminists these days?
>>220252829Learn portugeese
>>220255347No
>>220251272all laws only apply to sub8's
>>220255315Pakistani inteligence trying to punish the whole latinosphere for the reconquista by using accelerationist tactics, pushing hardcore feminist movements and draconian feminist laws to undermine men in iberia and latinamerica and eventually push islam as an solution
>>220251272Does this also apply retroactively?As in: that Brazilian men can get v& for some shit they said about women online like a year ago? (say, on a personal social media profile)
>>220256288No, unless there’s another speech law that applies. Laws in this country don’t work retroactively, so you can’t be punished for something that wasn’t illegal at the time you said it
>>220252829laughingstock of the civilized world tier law
>>220251272Last I checked you guys voted for this
