Polish women now get less than 1.0 children in their lifetime
Send in the black man
yes but if you please consult the gdp line, it is going up therefore good.
>>220306744Poland needs more immigrant breeders
>>220306744it seems that once the women start abandoning religion in favor of postmodern “left-wing” ideology, much of their interest in having children dries up.
>>220306744I like that demographics obsessed weirdos always assume these patterns are fixed, that nationstates are fixed and that immigration is never an option.>>220306921Not really, it's a consequence of becoming a developed country.
>>220306744No they don't. TFR is not able to measure the final amount of kids a woman has when she has entered menopause.(tempo effect)
>>220307097It's mostly accurate if you look at population pyramids.
>>220306999Your fertility rate is higher than a lot of thirdie countries.
>>220306744I wouldn't mind every country on earth naturally becoming several times less populous.
>>220307183no it isn't if you look at population pyramids
>>220306744Don't just blame women, it's people in general who aren't having kids. And why would they? Not having kids is simply easier in today's society. But whatever your opinion about having children, a society with a plummeting birth rate simply isn't sustainable. Humans only flourish when the individual cares for more than themself, when they support each other, and other generations. I would suggest a mandatory national service, but instead of 18 months in the military it's civilian service in day cares or looking after the elderly. If you have a child yourself you're exempt of course. Also you should only qualify for state pension if you raise a kid, otherwise you can make do with a private one.
>>220307296Yes, at tremendous expenditure for childcare and other social services that incentivize starting families.The point was that development is a much stronger corollary than religiosity.
>>220307349350k South Korean women born in 1994(31 or so being the average age year of birth-givers, more or less)250k kids born in 2025equals about 0.71, albeit there's a lot of women giving birth in SK who aren't Korean so the actual TFR gets a little boost
>>220307183>>220307426Poland:>2017: 4.1% of 30-352.4% of 0-5Ratio Difference: 1.7% (worse)TFR: 1.45 (better)>2025: 3.2% of 30-352.0% of 0-5Ratio Difference: 1.2% (better)TFR: 1.08 (worse)Pyramids with waves and TFR don't work really well. And you didn't even adress the underlaying tempo effect, which goes to OPs initial claim
>>220306744I can change that.
>>220307611men can't get pregnant
>>220307561You're counting both men and women in the 30-35. If you count only women, it's pretty close to 1.0. Also more men are born than women.
>>220307673I counted just women Stop moving the goalposts
>>220307758It's hard to follow what you're going for here. In the end, the Poles have a generational replacement rate of around half either way.
>>220306744I can fix that
Poland is dying not good, not good. I like Poles because I hate Germans, so more Poles = Better.
>>220307670Source?
>>220306744send in the balkan men
>>220306771Sir yes sir
