>Inside you there are two Albanians.
both are subhuman
I must be an apartment in Berlin!
>using the movie depiction of king baldwin>a movie by ridley scott>the most historically inaccurate fuckwit since mel gibsonThat makes sense. Those kinds of people are only playing make-believe anyway. They might as well used a fictional portrayal to represent their fictional activity.
Today I will use this Albanian dick
>>220447142>jew seethes at the christian onlyWhy are you always like this?
>>220447075Support islam always
>>220447195Where is he seething?>>220447142I watched this movie last sunday. I didn't liked that they said Saladin had 200k soldiers when In reality it was closer to 40kAlso the crusader fighting with a arrow pierced through his neck
>>220447142Ridley Scott I know, but how is Mel Gibson historically inaccurate?
>>220447195Ask a real question about what actually happened and we'll talk. Until then, go away, kid.>>220447284The numerical exaggeration thing is alright. It's a fairly common problem with historical documents from the period. Not just because people were shit at counting, it was often deliberate. You're tricking your men into thinking they have a chance, that they have to fight because the situation is grim, or to embellish your own victory. The neck thing isn't exactly outside the scope of reality, either. It's just that every Ridley Scott period piece is fucked up because for some reason you're not allowed to have a relatively accurate storyline alongside muh spectacle.>>220447351Cunt, have you seen Braveheart? His portrayal of Edward I alone was laughable. Let alone some of the shit he was doing with the Scotts. He turned a complex figures with a turbulent origin stories into a cheap, comic book characters for an audience who otherwise would have no interest whatsoever. He could have overlayed that narrative over any fictional shit he wanted. But "based on a true story" looks good for ticket sales.
>>220447445>The neck thing isn't exactly outside the scope of reality, eitheHmmm you sure about that
>>220447654It's not likely, but it's not impossible. I have an easier time believing someone could fight for maybe a minute while bleeding out if the wound was stuck with something, than I do believing Baldwin worse a mask. Especially since it's not documented that he ever wore a mask like that.
>>220447686He just walked around disfigured?
>>220447722As I understand it, more or less, yeah. But he still rode horses, fought, shit like that. So he was at least upholding his duties as a medieval warlord.
I will unite albania under one pagan banner.
>>220447786Muslim georgia
>>220447142holy reddit (you are right tho)
>>220447917I don't know what's Reddit about that. You seem to be the expert, so I'm guessing you must go there a lot.
>>220447075>King BALD+WINIt was over before it even began
