Would you support this IYC
sovl vs. soulless
>>220509218>>220509231>gentrification of bri'ainAll y'all now part of the gentry?
infinite gails-induced numbness of the mind, this country never stops looking for new ways to depress its citizens
>>220509231whats up with the jagged lane marking? >straighter than OP
The new design looks like a downtown strip mall in a mid-sized American city
>>220509218>>220509231WHERE IS THE SOUUUL
>>220509385no parking because there's a pedestrian crossing by it (probably near a school or something)
>>220509356I think it's good. Stops Indians and other thirdies brining their shit aesthetics to shops
>>220509218bottom doesn't look better at all, just more sterile or, dare I say it, souless
>>220509231If not for the weather there'd be little to no difference Tbh>>220509336Gentrification is good. The only people complaining about gentrification are caviar lefties who never had to interact with a drunk hobo who didn't wash himself for 2 weeks.
>>220509788Well the buildings are already fine, but the pavement widening, plants and better shop fronts are a big improvement imo
>>220509218Some trees wouldn't do any harm
>>220509218>Norfborough had to remove that flag
>neiborhood gets "gentrified">influx of brown people>trash everywhere now>widening sidewalks and street parking removal>rent just gets more expensive>get blamed for increasing prices by woke cunt despite having been in this neiborhood for 3 generationsk
>>220509218>shit buildings :(>shit buildings repainted :O
>>220509788>Gentrification is goodThis polak speaks the truth. "Soul" is only soulful if you experience it for a short while, and then you get to return to your cushy clean western city.
>>220509231kwab
>>220509218I like it.>>220509788>>220513469Correct. See, the flags who had to earn firstiedom gets it. I cannot believe there is a whole subculture in Anglo countries for complaining about when neighbourhoods get made clean and livable, it just sounds like cope for having to live by a ghetto.
>>220514002I was honestly surprised how anyone could be against it
>>220509218No because it adds costs to new developments. Having a body able to regulate shit like this is just another tool anti-development people will have in their arsenal. >>220509336Gentrification is a good thing
>>220509218>>220509231>How do we make this look better?>Fresh coats of paint, declutter the windows, spruce up the old designs?>No let's just make everything the sameAnglo councils are a crime against humanity
>>220515535>Fresh coats of paint, declutter the windows, spruce up the old designs?they literally did this though
The Norwegian countryside is filled with unused boat sheds and outhouses in a derelict state.Maybe we should starting fining those people.
>>220509218>>220509231not letting businesses display their logo on the sign is really dumb. Logos have utility, and they don't look bad.
>>220509218we already have this hereif your street facing house or shop looks like ass you get a penalty
>>220515796They didn't have logos before
>>220509218Top: UKBottom: USA
>>220513021Gentrification in Canada simply means everything is more expensive with none of the benefits. Nobody knows where the money goes (as in who's pockets) and poors still dirty everything anyways
>>220509218The one below would look nice with picrel. A few trees would also help
